Thu, 2 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 1, 2026 · 21:25
India News Updated Jun 1, 2026

SC Seeks Centre's Reply on PIL Over Disability Act Grievance Failures

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre on a PIL seeking effective implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The PIL highlights persistent failures in compliance with Disability Commission recommendations and lack of basic infrastructure. It notes that only 4 states offer online grievance registration and 20 commissions lack functional websites. The petition also points to the absence of a full-time Chief Commissioner since 2019.

SC notice on PIL alleging ineffective implementation of RPwD Act, 2016

New Delhi, June 1

The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre on a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to ensure the effective functioning of statutory grievance redressal mechanisms under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale sought a response from the Union government and directed that the matter be tagged to a pending petition raising similar issues. The case has been listed for further hearing on July 21.

The PIL, filed by lawyer and disability rights advocate Shashank Pandey, has sought directions for the effective implementation of recommendations issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) and State Commissioners, as well as measures to address gaps in the composition, resourcing, and functioning of Disability Commissions across the country.

According to the petition, the RPwD Act established the offices of the Chief Commissioner and State Commissioners as the primary enforcement and oversight bodies for protecting the rights of persons with disabilities.

However, it is alleged that these institutions have been rendered only partially effective due to persistent implementation failures.

Highlighting structural deficiencies, the petition stated that executive authorities frequently fail to comply with recommendations issued by Disability Commissions and, in many cases, do not even furnish reasons for such non-compliance, despite a statutory requirement to do so.

"In a large majority of cases, authorities neither comply with the recommendations nor provide any justification, thereby undermining the statutory mandate," the plea submitted, adding that penal provisions meant to enforce compliance remain largely unused.

The petition further alleged that most Disability Commissions lack basic institutional infrastructure, including public-facing websites and online grievance redressal systems.

It claimed that only 4 State Commissioners for Persons with Disabilities currently offer online grievance registration, while 20 State Commissions do not have functional websites.

It also highlighted the absence of advisory committees envisaged under the RPwD Act to assist the Chief Commissioner and State Commissioners, stating that no such committees appear to have been constituted.

The plea raised concerns over vacancies in the disability rights watchdog. It said there has been no full-time Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities since 2019, with senior government officials holding the position as an additional charge, contrary to the statutory framework.

Referring to a representation submitted to the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities in January this year, the petitioner said no action had been taken to address the issues flagged.

"The grievance redressal machinery for giving effect to such rights and entitlements has been rendered partially ineffective due to implementation gaps," the petition said, adding that persons with disabilities continue to face "structural exclusion due to the ineffective functioning of statutory enforcement mechanisms".

The plea has sought directions to strengthen enforcement powers and institutional accountability mechanisms under the RPwD Act to ensure "effective, uniform, and meaningful protection of disability rights across India".

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

The fact that only 4 states have online grievance registration is shocking. We are supposed to be a digital India. This shows how disabled citizens are completely ignored. The government needs to stop treating this as some charity issue and actually enforce the law properly.

Ravi K

I work with a disability NGO in Bangalore. The situation on ground is pathetic. Even when recommendations are made, local authorities just sit on them. The penalty provisions should be used more often to force compliance. Good that Supreme Court is taking notice.

James A

Important step. But let's be honest - even developed countries struggle with this. The real challenge in India is changing the mindset that sees disability as a pity issue rather than a rights issue. The law is good but implementation will take decades unless awareness grows.

Ananya R

My uncle uses a wheelchair and trying to get a simple ramp installed in his local government office took 2 years of follow-up. The system is broken. I hope this PIL leads to some real accountability for these commissioners who are just collecting salaries without doing anything meaningful. 😡

Ramesh W

Good that this is being raised. But I wonder how many people actually know about the RPwD Act? Most Indians have no idea about disability rights. Awareness campaigns should be part of this too, not just court orders. Otherwise it's just paperwork.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked