Tue, 27 Oct 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 1, 2026 · 21:25
West Bengal News Updated Jun 1, 2026

BSF Pushes for Relocation of 360 Zero-Line Villages in Bengal After Government Change

The BSF is set to accelerate the relocation of zero-line villages in West Bengal for better border management. These 360 villages, home to 70,000 people, are within 150 yards of the border, hindering fencing and security. Officials cite risks like smuggling and criminal exploitation due to isolated settlements. The process is expected to gain momentum after the change in state government.

BSF eyes relocation of zero-line villages in Bengal after change of govt

Kolkata, June 1

The Border Security Force is set to push for the relocation of all zero-line villages in West Bengal to facilitate more effective management of the Indo-Bangladesh Border.

The BSF has been pursuing the issue for several years. However, according to senior officials, the process is expected to gather momentum following the change of government in the state.

"The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has been pursuing the matter for several years now. Adequate compensation has been offered. All that the state government needs to do is find suitable land at a distance from the border and acquire it. Any farmland close to the border can remain, and people can tend to their crops during the day," a senior BSF official said.

Zero-line villages are those located within 150 yards of the International Border. The presence of such villages makes border fencing difficult. A few Indian villages are even located beyond the border fence.

"They are totally isolated, with little access to emergency services at night when the fence gates are locked. The villagers themselves have said that they are at the mercy of Bangladeshi criminals. They are ready to move, but there was no initiative on the part of the civil administration," the official said.

India shares a 4,096.7-km land border with Bangladesh. Of this, 2,216.7 km falls in West Bengal.

Officials said there are nearly 360 zero-line villages in the state, with a population of around 70,000. Most of them are located in the districts of Malda, Murshidabad and Cooch Behar.

"Fencing has not been possible in most places where these villages exist. Effective border management is not possible with people living so close to the border. Criminals take advantage of such villages for smuggling, illegal immigration, trafficking and other illegal activities," the official said.

Such settlements also require the deployment of a larger number of personnel, as round-the-clock vigilance has to be maintained to prevent cross-border movement.

Officials are hopeful that the issue will be resolved and the villages relocated over the next couple of years.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

This is a double-edged sword. While security is important, uprooting 70,000 people is massive. Will the compensation truly cover their livelihood loss? Farming families cannot just relocate and leave their fields behind. The promise of 'tending during the day' is unrealistic when you have to travel far.

James A

As someone who works in the security sector, this is long overdue. Smuggling and trafficking are rampant through these 'soft zones' on the border. The BSF has a tough job. Relocating the villages is a necessary step for secure borders and to protect those very villagers from criminal elements from across the border.

Kavya N

I hope the compensation is more than just 'adequate'. These families have generational ties to their land. The state government must ensure transparent land acquisition and proper resettlement with basic amenities. Otherwise, it will just be another case of development displacing poor people. 🤔

Siddharth J

Great to see change of guard in Bengal might finally unlock this. The previous government dragged its feet for years. If you live in a place where the Bangladeshi side has a shop 150 yards away, you are not really in India. The border should be managed effectively.

Michael C

From a practical standpoint, it makes sense. It cuts down on troop deployment per km. But, the villagers must be given a fair deal. If they are willing to move as the article says, then the compensation package needs to be attractive enough. Also, what about the cultural roots? It's a tough decision.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked