Key Points

A Jharkhand court has issued a non-bailable warrant against Rahul Gandhi in a 2018 defamation case involving controversial remarks about Amit Shah. The case originated from comments Gandhi made during a Congress party event, which Pratap Katiyar found defamatory towards the then-BJP National President. Despite multiple legal attempts to avoid personal appearance, the court has directed Gandhi to appear on June 26. This legal challenge is part of a broader pattern of defamation cases facing the prominent Congress leader.

Key Points: Rahul Gandhi Faces Arrest Warrant in Amit Shah Defamation Case

  • Chaibasa court orders Gandhi to appear on June 26
  • Defamation case stems from 2018 Congress event remarks
  • High Court previously granted interim relief
  • Multiple defamation cases pending against Congress leader
2 min read

Jharkhand court issues non-bailable warrant against Rahul Gandhi in defamation case

Jharkhand court issues non-bailable warrant against Rahul Gandhi for 2018 remarks about BJP leader Amit Shah

"No murderer can become the National President in Congress - Rahul Gandhi (2018)"

Ranchi, May 24

The MP-MLA Special Court in Chaibasa, Jharkhand, has issued a non-bailable warrant against senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in connection with a 2018 defamation case.

The court has directed Rahul Gandhi to appear in person on June 26.

The case stems from alleged derogatory remarks made by Rahul Gandhi during a Congress party event in 2018, in which he is accused of making disparaging comments about the then-BJP National President, Amit Shah.

According to the complaint filed by Pratap Katiyar, a resident of Chaibasa, Gandhi had remarked that “no murderer can become the National President in Congress. Congressmen cannot accept a murderer as the National President, this is possible only in the BJP.”

The complainant viewed this as a defamatory statement directed at Amit Shah and lodged a complaint on July 9, 2018.

In April 2022, the Chaibasa court had initially issued a bailable warrant against Rahul Gandhi after no response was received. However, when Gandhi failed to respond, the court escalated the matter and issued a non-bailable warrant in February 2024.

Gandhi’s legal team sought an exemption from personal appearance in the Chaibasa court, but the plea was rejected.

The Congress leader subsequently approached the Jharkhand High Court, which granted him interim relief and stayed the warrant for several months.

However, in March 2024, the High Court disposed of the petition, paving the way for the trial to proceed in the lower court.

Following the resumption of hearings, Gandhi’s counsel again requested exemption from personal appearance, which was once again turned down by the Chaibasa court.

A defamation case against Rahul Gandhi is also going on in the Sultanpur court. On May 17, the hearing in the case could not take place as there was a workshop for lawyers.

He had appeared in person in the Sultanpur court in July last year. This defamation case is also related to Rahul Gandhi’s remarks against Amit Shah.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
This is getting ridiculous now. Politicians should focus on real issues like unemployment and inflation rather than filing defamation cases against each other. The court's time could be better spent on serious matters. 🤦‍♂️
P
Priya M.
Whether you support Rahul Gandhi or not, the law should be equal for everyone. If he made defamatory remarks, he should face the consequences like any common citizen would. No VIP culture please!
A
Amit S.
The timing of this warrant is suspicious. Elections are over and now suddenly this old case is being revived? Our judiciary should not appear to be influenced by political pressures. Justice delayed is justice denied.
S
Sunita R.
As a woman from Jharkhand, I'm more concerned about why our courts are spending so much time on political cases when there are thousands of pending cases related to women's safety and tribal rights in our state.
V
Vikram J.
Political leaders should maintain decorum in their speeches. While I don't support harsh legal action, Rahul Gandhi should have been more careful with his words. Public figures have responsibility towards maintaining political discourse.
N
Neha T.
The bigger question is - why is our political debate reduced to personal attacks? Both sides need to grow up and discuss policies. We deserve better from our leaders! #SickOfDirtyPolitics

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50