Sat, 4 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated May 31, 2026 · 07:15
Andhra Pradesh News Updated May 31, 2026

YSRCP MP Gurumoorthy Seeks SC Status for Dalit Christians Before Justice Balakrishnan Commission

YSRCP MP Maddila Gurumoorthy has written to the Justice Balakrishnan Commission seeking SC status for Dalit Christians. He submitted a representation in New Delhi on Saturday, citing constitutional principles of equality and secularism. Gurumoorthy argued that conversion to Christianity does not erase caste identity or historical discrimination. He also noted the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly's unanimous resolution supporting this inclusion.

YSRCP MP Gurumoorthy urges Justice Balakrishnan Commission to grant SC status to Dalit Christians

New Delhi, May 31

The Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party MP Maddila Gurumoorthy has writtens to the Chairperson of Justice Balakrishnan Commission seeking the inclusion of Dalit Christians under the Constitution Order, 1950, to ensure constitutional equality, social justice, and statutory protection.

A YSRC delegation led by Gurumoorthy met the commission's chairperson in New Delhi on Saturday and submitted a representation seeking the extension of SC status to Dalit Christians.

The letter stated, "I most respectfully submit this representation before the Hon'ble Justice Balakrishnan Commission seeking inclusion of Christians of Scheduled Caste origin within the ambit of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, in furtherance of the constitutional principles of equality, secularism, social justice, and substantive non-discrimination."

The MP cited the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly's unanimous resolution of March 24, 2023, where former Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and the YSR Congress Party recognised that Dalit Christians remain socially and economically backward, recommending their inclusion in the SC list.

"It is pertinent to submit that the former Chief Minister, Shri Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, on behalf of the YSR Congress Party, through a unanimous resolution adopted by the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly on 24 March 2023, categorically resolved that Dalit Christians continue to remain socially, educationally, and economically backward to the same extent as Scheduled Castes professing Hinduism, Sikhism, and Buddhism, and accordingly supported their inclusion in the Scheduled Castes list," Gurumoorthy wrote.

Gurumoorthy alleged that Dalit Christians continue to face social, educational, and economic disadvantages similar to other Scheduled Castes, despite being excluded due to religion. He noted that conversion to Christianity does not erase caste identity or the historical discrimination faced by the community.

"The continued exclusion of Dalit Christians constitutes an arbitrary religion-based classification lacking any rational nexus with the constitutional object of protective discrimination. Conversion to Christianity has neither extinguished caste identity nor eliminated the historical and continuing social disabilities attached to their caste origin. Despite exercising freedom of religion under Article 25 of the Constitution, Dalit Christians continue to face caste-based exclusion, social segregation, economic deprivation, and institutional discrimination."

He further argued that the exclusion frustrates the constitutional mandate under Article 46, which obliges the State to protect weaker sections from social injustice and exploitation. He alleged that Dalit Christians continue to face caste-based disadvantages identical to other Scheduled Castes but remain outside the purview of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, creating a legal and statutory gap.

"The present legal position also frustrates the constitutional vision under Article 46, which obligates the State to protect weaker sections from social injustice and exploitation. Despite suffering identical caste-based vulnerabilities, Dalit Christians remain excluded from protection under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 solely on account of religion, thereby creating a serious constitutional and statutory vacuum."

The MP stressed that Article 341(2) empowers Parliament to include communities in the Scheduled Castes list, and this power should be exercised in line with contemporary social realities and constitutional principles.

"It is respectfully submitted that Article 341(2) expressly empowers Parliament to include communities within the Scheduled Castes list by law. The constitutional power vested therein must now be exercised in consonance with contemporary social realities and constitutional morality."

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

Finally someone is taking this seriously. I have Dalit Christian friends who can't access any government schemes meant for SCs. The 1950 order is outdated. Caste is a social reality that doesn't care about your religion. 🙏

Vikram M

While I understand the sentiment, I'm concerned about potential misuse. If we extend SC status to all Christian converts, won't that create more demands from other religious groups? The Constitution intentionally kept religion out of this for a reason. We need a careful, data-driven approach, not just political populism.

Michael C

As someone who works in rural Andhra, I can tell you that caste discrimination is very real even among Christians. The church hierarchy often mirrors caste divisions. This isn't about religion - it's about facing the same historical injustice. About time we fixed this loophole. 👍

Siddharth J

I'm a bit sceptical. Jagan Reddy is just trying to please the Christian vote bank in Andhra. Why didn't YSRCP do this when they were in power? Now that they're out of government, they're suddenly concerned. The issue is genuine, but the timing reeks of politics. Still, justice delayed shouldn't be justice denied.

Rohit P

The MP's argument about Article 46 is spot on. If the state is obligated to protect weaker sections, how can it discriminate based on religion? A Dalit is a Dalit regardless of whether they go to a temple or a church. The Prevention of Atrocities Act exclusion is unacceptable. 👏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked