more-news

Himachal cricket body plea against CM dismissed

Shimla, Jan 8 : In a setback to the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association, the state high court Wednesday rejected as "misconceived" the application of the cricket body, led by BJP MP Anurag Thakur, to implead Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh and three government officials in a land row case.


Pronouncing the order, reserved Jan 4, a division bench of acting Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir and Justice Kuldip Singh observed: "We, however, wonder why the petitioners have filed another motion for arraying non-applicants as party-respondents. The said relief is misconceived."

The bench, however, allowed the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association (HPCA) to amend its writ petition within three weeks relating to the observations of the state registrar of cooperative societies.

The court will next hear the case March 22.

The petitioners alleged the entire government machinery under the influence of the chief minister, in a midnight swoop Oct 26 last year, forcibly evicted the HPCA from its stadia, principally the picturesque Dharamsala stadium.

The government, however, said its decision to cancel the lease and to take control of HPCA's properties was withdrawn by it Nov 18 last year and on account of this development, most of the prayers made in the writ petition have become infructuous.

The government also submitted the chief minister and others, including Director General of Police Sanjay Kumar, were not necessarily parties as they were not concerned with the matter in their personal capacities.

It also said the plea for amendment of writ petition was frivolous and meant merely to delay the proceedings and to remain in possession of the properties.

Earlier, the high court had indicted the government for forcible eviction of the HPCA from its stadia and ordered restoration of possession to it.

The court then ordered status quo ante with respect to the cabinet decision taking over the properties.

"The orders of forcible dispossession are against law, constitutional guarantee and obligations of the state to its citizens as a person in settled possession of a premises cannot be dispossessed by an executive fiat, even though he can be stated as a trespasser," the bench observed.

--IANS (Posted on 08-01-2014)

more-news headlines

Mulayam justifies Azam Khan's controversial remark

Ghaziabad lawyers boycott courts

93-year-old Ram Sundar Das files nomination from Hajipur

Music fest in Himachal to raise money for kids

Delhi High Court summons chief secretary over water contamination

Smriti Irani files nomination from Amethi

Appoint special prosecutor for sex crimes against children: High Court

BJP caught in the hands of one man: Sonia

Complete drain de-silting work by May 15: Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung

Stop fooling the nation, Rahul tells Modi

HC seeks report on deplorable condition of children's parks

Security arrangements in place for Thursday's Udhampur poll

Quick Links: Goa | Munnar | Pondicherry | Free Yearly Horoscope '2014

Comments

Your e-mail:


Your Full Name:


Type verification image:
verification image, type it in the box

Message:

Back to Top