Key Points

A GTRI report highlights Trump’s aggressive trade tactics, using tariffs to force one-sided deals. India may still face a 10% levy even after signing an agreement. The U.S. threatens 40% tariffs on non-compliant nations by August 1. GTRI warns these pressured pacts lack fairness and long-term stability.

Key Points: Trump Uses Tariffs to Force Trade Deals Without Reciprocity GTRI Says

  • Trump avoids mutual tariff cuts in trade deals
  • India faces 10% levy despite pending deal
  • New tariffs could reach 40% for non-compliant nations
  • GTRI warns deals lack long-term certainty
  • Legal basis for tariffs remains uncertain
3 min read

Trade by Threat - Trump forces compliance, not cooperation: GTRI

GTRI report reveals Trump's trade strategy relies on pressure tactics, not mutual benefits, leaving partner nations vulnerable to future tariff threats.

"Trump’s trade strategy circumvents traditional FTAs, demanding tariff cuts without reciprocal U.S. concessions. – GTRI"

New Delhi, July 8

US President has again turned to tariffs as a pressure tool in trade negotiations, a report by the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has said that Trump is using tariffs not to build partnerships, but as a tool to force countries into compliance.

According to GTRI, Trump's trade strategy is based on pressure tactics rather than cooperation, turning trade deals into one-sided forced pacts.

The report said that Trump's approach avoids traditional Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) rules that are based on mutual tariff cuts and reciprocal benefits. Instead, his strategy demands that partner countries reduce tariffs and commit to buying U.S. goods, while the U.S. offers no similar concessions in return.

These deals are signed under pressure and lack fairness, GTRI noted.

GTRI said, "Trump's trade strategy circumvents traditional Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), demanding tariff cuts and purchase commitments from partner countries without reciprocal U.S. concessions."

One of the key points highlighted in the report is that no trade deal under Trump offers long-term certainty. Even after signing an agreement, countries remain vulnerable to fresh tariff threats.

For instance, Trump recently announced a 10 per cent tariff threat on BRICS nations, including India, citing their "anti-American policies." This shows the political and unpredictable nature of U.S. trade actions under Trump.

India has already submitted its final trade offer and is expected to conclude a deal with the U.S. soon. However, the GTRI report warned that this agreement may not protect Indian exports from future unilateral tariff hikes.

The report said that even if a deal is signed, Indian exports may continue to face a minimum 10 per cent additional levy. This is because the 26 per cent surcharge imposed in April on Indian goods might not be fully withdrawn.

"Even if a deal is struck, Indian exports may still face a minimum 10 per cent additional levy, making it a pressured compromise, not a true partnership," GTRI stated.

President Trump has extended the deadline for countries to sign trade deals from July 8 to July 31. After this, starting August 1, countries that do not comply may face country-specific tariffs of up to 40 per cent. India is among the countries that have received formal tariff warning letters from the U.S. administration.

The report also noted that these new tariffs will be imposed over and above the existing Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates, but will not apply to sectors like steel, aluminium, autos, and auto parts that already face separate duties.

For example, in Japan's case, proposed tariffs on products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, books, smartphones, energy, and copper will remain at 0 per cent. Meanwhile, steel and aluminum will continue at 50 per cent, autos and auto parts at 25 per cent, and other products will see tariffs rise from 10 per cent to 25 per cent.

GTRI pointed out that Trump lacks the Fast Track Trade Authority from Congress, which means he cannot legally reduce MFN tariffs. Instead, he is offering to roll back only the "Liberation Day" tariffs imposed in April using emergency powers.

However, a U.S. federal court has already ruled these tariffs unlawful, and the case is currently under appeal, making the legal basis for these tariffs uncertain.

GTRI concluded that such deals offer limited benefits while leaving the door open for future tariff actions by the U.S., raising concerns about the long-term stability and fairness of these agreements.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Very concerning report. America first shouldn't mean everyone else last. Our government should explore alternative markets and strengthen domestic manufacturing to reduce dependence on US trade. Make in India is more important than ever!
A
Aman W
While I agree Trump's methods are aggressive, let's not forget India also imposes high tariffs on many imports. Maybe we need to rethink our own trade policies too? Just saying 🤷‍♂️
S
Shreya B
This is why we need stronger trade partnerships within BRICS nations. The US can't keep treating emerging economies like this. Time for India to play the global trade game smarter! 💪
V
Vikram M
The 10% additional levy even after deal signing is unacceptable. Our exporters will suffer. Government should provide subsidies or tax benefits to affected industries to compensate.
K
Kavya N
I'm worried about small businesses that rely on US exports. These tariff threats create so much uncertainty. Hope our trade ministry has a solid Plan B ready. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50