Key Points

The Supreme Court has dismissed a Congress legislator's petition seeking a Vigilance probe into payments made to the Kerala Chief Minister's daughter's IT firm. The court clearly stated that political disputes should not be fought in courtrooms. While acknowledging the MLA's commendable work in disaster management, the judges cautioned against extending activism to every sphere. The ruling comes amid ongoing political tensions in Kerala over the controversial payment allegations.

Key Points: Supreme Court Dismisses Congress Plea Against Kerala CM Daughter

  • Supreme Court bench led by CJI Gavai dismissed Congress MLA's Vigilance probe petition
  • Court observed courts shouldn't become platforms for political battles
  • Justice Chandran praised MLA's disaster work but cautioned against over-activism
  • Both Kerala High Court and Vigilance Court found no basis for investigation
  • Congress MLA vows to continue political and legal fight despite dismissal
  • Controversy involves monthly payments from CMRL to CM's daughter's IT firm
2 min read

SC dismisses Cong legislator's plea for Vigilance probe in CMRL, Kerala CM daughter's IT firm

SC rejects Congress MLA's petition for Vigilance probe into CMRL payments to Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan's daughter Veena Vijayan's IT firm Exalogic Solutions.

"Political disputes should be resolved outside the courtroom - Chief Justice B.R. Gavai"

New Delhi, Oct 6

The Supreme Court, on Monday, dismissed a petition filed by Congress legislator Mathew Kuzhalnadan seeking a Vigilance probe into the alleged monthly payment transactions between Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL) and Exalogic Solutions, the now defunct IT firm of Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan's daughter Veena Vijayan.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai, with Justice Vinod Chandran, rejected the plea while observing that courts should not be converted into platforms for political battles.

"Political disputes should be resolved outside the courtroom," the Chief Justice remarked.

Justice Chandran, concurring with the view, said that while Kuzhalnadan's active role in disaster management and relief work was commendable, such activism "need not be extended to every sphere".

Kuzhalnadan had approached the apex court challenging the Kerala High Court's decision upholding the Thiruvananthapuram Vigilance Court's order that dismissed his request for an inquiry.

Both these courts had found no basis to order a Vigilance investigation into the matter.

Following the dismissal, the Congress MLA said that his petition was rejected on technical grounds, but asserted that his political and legal fight over the controversial monthly payment issue would continue.

The controversy originated from Kuzhalnadan's allegation that CMRL, a Kochi-based company, made monthly payments to Exalogic, suggesting a possible conflict of interest involving the Chief Minister's family.

The state government and those concerned have consistently denied the charges, terming them "politically motivated".

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court will hear arguments related to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) probe into the same issue on October 28 and 29.

The Supreme Court's observation comes amid heightened political tensions in Kerala, with the Opposition Congress-led UDF pressing for transparency in the Exalogic deal, while the ruling LDF said that all allegations are part of a targeted smear campaign.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh Q
As a Keralite, I'm deeply concerned about these allegations. Even if courts dismiss it on technical grounds, the public deserves to know the truth about these transactions. Transparency matters in democracy!
S
Sarah B
Three courts have now found no basis for investigation. When will the opposition accept that this is just political mudslinging? Focus on real issues affecting common people instead of these manufactured controversies.
A
Arjun K
The timing is suspicious though - just before elections. Both sides are playing politics. But the common man suffers when institutions are used for political battles. Justice Chandran's balanced view is appreciated.
M
Michael C
Respectfully disagree with the Supreme Court's approach. When there are allegations of corruption involving CM's family, courts should ensure proper investigation. Technical dismissals don't address public concerns. 🇮🇳
N
Nisha Z
High Court, Vigilance Court, and now Supreme Court - all saying the same thing. Maybe it's time to accept that this was indeed a politically motivated case. Let's focus on development issues in Kerala instead.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50