Sabarimala Gold Heist: Court Denies Bail to Ex-TDB Chief Amid Probe

The Kollam Vigilance Court has denied bail to former TDB president A. Padmakumar in the Sabarimala gold heist case. He argued the controversial decision was collective and not his alone. The probe is examining how temple gold was recorded as copper in official minutes. This development keeps the high-profile case in sharp legal and political focus.

Key Points: Sabarimala Gold Heist Case Bail Denied to Ex-TDB Chief Padmakumar

  • Court rejects bail plea of former TDB chief in Kattillappalli gold heist sub-case
  • Padmakumar argues the decision was collective, approved by all board members
  • He claims meeting minutes recording gold as 'copper' were transparent
  • VACB probe examines procedural lapses and suspected record manipulation
2 min read

Sabarimala gold heist case: Court denies bail to TDB ex-chief Padmakumar

Kerala court rejects bail for former TDB president A. Padmakumar in the Sabarimala gold heist case, tightening the probe into alleged temple asset misappropriation.

"He strongly objected to being singled out as the sole accused for a decision he claimed was shared across the institution’s leadership. - From the article"

Kollam, Dec 12

The Sabarimala gold heist investigation took a significant turn on Friday, with the Kollam Vigilance Court rejecting the bail application of former Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) President A. Padmakumar.

The court dismissed his plea linked to the Kattillappalli sub-case, marking a setback for the senior CPI(M) leader as the probe tightens around alleged procedural lapses and suspected illicit handling of temple assets.

Padmakumar is also a former CPI(M) legislator who represented the Konni Assembly constituency and is considered close to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

Padmakumar, who headed the TDB during the period in question, had argued in his bail plea that the decision to hand over the palika (gold sheets) to the first accused, Unnikrishnan Potti, was a collective one, taken with the full knowledge and approval of all board members.

He maintained that the minutes of the meeting -- which controversially recorded the material as “copper” instead of gold -- were prepared transparently and with the consent of the entire board.

In his application, Padmakumar strongly objected to being singled out as the sole accused for a decision he claimed was shared across the institution’s leadership.

He alleged that investigative agencies were attempting to isolate him while sparing other members who, he insisted, bore equal responsibility.

This contention, however, failed to convince the court, which refused to grant relief.

The rejection is seen as an important development in the high-profile case involving the alleged misappropriation and smuggling of temple property from the sacred Sabarimala shrine.

The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), which is spearheading the probe, has been examining procedural violations and suspected manipulation of records.

Meanwhile, the case’s prime accused, Unnikrishnan Potti, has also moved the Kollam Vigilance Court seeking bail.

His application is scheduled to come up for hearing on December 18, and the outcome is expected to influence the trajectory of the wider investigation.

With the VACB tightening scrutiny and courts taking a firm stance, the Sabarimala gold heist case is set to remain in political and legal focus in the coming weeks.

So far, six people have been arrested, and all are in jail.

In the coming days, the Kerala High Court-appointed SIT is likely to record the arrest of a few more people and is expected to call more for questioning.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the alleged crime is serious, the legal process must be fair. If Padmakumar's claim about it being a collective decision is true, then why is he the only one facing charges? The investigation needs to be transparent and unbiased.
P
Priyanka N
Typical political blame game. First they loot the temple's wealth, then they point fingers at each other. The court's decision sends a strong message that such brazen acts won't be tolerated. Hope the SIT uncovers the whole truth.
A
Aman W
This case shows the rot in our temple administration systems. TDB has been controversial for years. It's high time for a complete overhaul with more devotee representation and digital transparency for all donations and assets.
K
Karthik V
The "copper" vs. gold detail is just shocking. It's like they weren't even trying to hide it. Denying bail is the first step towards justice. The common devotee who offers their hard-earned gold must feel utterly betrayed.
M
Michael C
Watching this from abroad. Corruption in religious institutions is a global problem, but the scale here and the audacity to alter records is concerning. Hope the judiciary remains independent and sees this through.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50