India Issues Chair Statement at BRICS Meet Amid West Asia Differences

India issued a chair's statement after the BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting in New Delhi due to differing views among members on the West Asia conflict. The ministers reaffirmed their commitment to multilateral cooperation and condemned violations of international humanitarian law. They strongly condemned terrorism, including the Jammu and Kashmir attack, and called for zero tolerance. The meeting also focused on counter-terrorism cooperation and the need for early resolution of the West Asia crisis.

Key Points: India Issues BRICS Chair Statement Over West Asia Differences

  • India issues chair statement due to West Asia differences
  • BRICS reaffirms commitment to multilateral cooperation
  • Strong condemnation of terrorism and Jammu and Kashmir attack
  • Emphasis on dialogue, diplomacy, and international law
3 min read

India issues chair statement after BRICS meeting amid differences over West Asia conflict

India issues a chair's statement after BRICS foreign ministers meeting in New Delhi due to differing views on West Asia conflict, reaffirming commitment to multilateral cooperation.

"There were differing views among some members as regard to the situation in the West Asia/Middle East region. - BRICS Chair's Statement"

New Delhi, May 15

Insisting that there were differing views among members with regard to the situation in West Asia and the Middle East, India on Friday issued a chair's statement instead of a joint statement at the conclusion of the two-day BRICS Foreign Ministers' Meeting in New Delhi.

The BRICS Ministers of Foreign Affairs reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening multilateral cooperation to address humanitarian crisis worldwide and expressed concern at the dwindling of international responses. They strongly condemned all violations of international humanitarian law, including deliberate attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure, as well as the denial or obstruction of humanitarian access and the targeting of humanitarian personnel.

The ministers underlined the need to address accountability for violations of international humanitarian law. They acknowledged international efforts made by BRICS members to promote respect for, adherence to, and effective implementation of International Humanitarian Law.

"There were differing views among some members as regard to the situation in the West Asia/Middle East region. BRICS members expressed their respective national positions and shared a range of perspectives. Views articulated by them included the need for an early resolution of the current crisis, the value of dialogue and diplomacy, respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, upholding international law, the importance of safe and unimpeded flow of maritime commerce through international waterways, and the protection of civilian infrastructure and civilian lives. The impact of recent developments on the global economic situation was stressed by many members."

The ministers expressed strong condemnation of any acts of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable, irrespective of their motivation, whenever, wherever and by whomsoever committed. They condemned the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir in April last year, which claimed 26 lives and injured several others.

"They reaffirmed their commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing and safe havens. They reiterated that terrorism should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group and that all those involved in terrorist activities and their support must be held accountable and brought to justice in accordance with relevant national and international law. They urged to ensure zero tolerance for terrorism and rejected double standards in countering terrorism," the statement said.

They stressed the primary responsibility of nations in combating terrorism and the global efforts to stop and counter terrorist threats must fully comply with their obligations under international law, including the Charter of the UN, particularly the purposes and principles thereof, and relevant international conventions and protocols, in particular international human rights law, international refugee law and international humanitarian law, as applicable.

The ministers welcomed the activities of the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group (CTWG) and its five Subgroups based upon the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Strategy, the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Action Plan and the CTWG position paper. They looked forward to further deepening counter-terrorism cooperation. They called for an expeditious finalisation and adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism in the UN framework. They called for concerted actions against all UN designated terrorists and terrorist entities.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I appreciate India's balanced approach here. While Russia and China might lean one way on Gaza, India correctly kept the focus on humanitarian law and accountability for all violations. The mention of safe maritime commerce is crucial too—our trade routes matter. But I hope next time we push harder for an immediate ceasefire.
J
James A
As an outsider looking in, it's interesting to see BRICS struggling to find common ground on the Middle East. India's middle-path diplomacy is sensible but doesn't it risk making BRICS toothless? If members can't agree on fundamental humanitarian issues, what's the point of the bloc?
V
Vikram M
The strong condemnation of terrorism, including the Jammu and Kashmir attack, is exactly what we need from BRICS. Too often global forums shy away from calling out cross-border terrorism. India is right to keep pushing for the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism—Pakistan and others need to be held accountable.
S
Sarah B
While I respect India's diplomatic finesse, I worry that the chair statement is too vague. "Differing views" doesn't address the 30,000+ dead in Gaza. India could have been bolder in calling for an end to arms supplies to Israel. But I understand the geopolitical tightrope—balancing ties with Iran, Russia, and the US simultaneously. 😕
A
Ananya R
"Zero tolerance for terrorism" but rejecting double standards—that's the key line. India's stance is clear: terrorism is terrorism whether it happens in Mumbai, Paris, or Gaza. The BRICS statement rightly condemns attacks on civilians everywhere. We need more such principled positions in global diplomacy. 👏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50