Paul McCartney performs silent track for AI protest album
Los Angeles, Nov 17
The Beatles legend Sir Paul McCartney recently went behind the mic to lend his voice to a "silent" track.
The singer-songwriter has performed for the song in protest of the UK government’s AI copyright stance, reports ‘Female First UK’.
The 83-year-old Beatles legend's offering is set to be released as a bonus track on the physical copy of the compilation album ‘Is This What We Want?’, which was initially released digitally earlier this year and contains silent recordings from empty recording studios to highlight the importance of human contribution in music making.
As per ‘Female First UK’, more than 1,000 artistes, including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn and Annie Lennox, contributed to the album.
The tracklisting for ‘Is This What We Want?’ spells out, “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companiesâ€.
‘Wuthering Heights’ hitmaker Kate, 67, said in a statement, “In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?â€
The physical album will arrive on December 8. All of the profits will benefit the charity Help Musicians, which offers a broad range of support to musicians in times of crisis.
Macca was also among 400 artists who signed an open letter to Britain's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for their works to protect against AI learning models. The likes of McCartney, Sir Elton John, Dua Lipa, and Coldplay protested the government's proposal to make creatives "opt out" of having their work used to train AI models.
Macca warned that artistes will be ripped off by this approach. He told the BBC earlier this year, “You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it offâ€.
Referencing Beatles classic Yesterday, he continued, “The truth is, the money’s going somewhere. Somebody’s getting paid, so why shouldn’t it be the guy who sat down and wrote Yesterday?â€
He said in a message for the Labour government, “We are the people, you’re the Government. You’re supposed to protect us. That’s your job. So you know, if you’re putting through a Bill, make sure you protect the creative thinkers, the creative artists, or you’re not going to have themâ€.
— IANS
Reader Comments
Respect to Paul McCartney for standing up for artists' rights! This reminds me of the copyright issues our Indian musicians face with streaming platforms. Hope our government takes note.
While I support artist protection, I feel the protest could have been more impactful with actual music. A silent track might not reach the masses effectively. Still, the cause is important for creators everywhere.
As someone working in tech, I understand both sides. AI can help creativity but shouldn't steal from artists. The "opt out" approach is unfair - it should be "opt in" for using creative works.
Love that profits go to Help Musicians! â¤ï¸ We need similar initiatives in India to support our talented artists during difficult times. Human creativity is priceless and must be protected.
McCartney's point about "Yesterday" is spot on! If AI can recreate classics without compensating creators, what incentive is there for new talent? This affects musicians globally, including in India.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.