Mon, 15 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 14, 2026 · 15:26
Middle East News Updated Jun 14, 2026

Iran Weighs Final Decision on US MoU Amid Domestic Protests and Diplomatic Moves

Iran has not yet finalized its decision on a Memorandum of Understanding with the US, as review of political, legal, and technical aspects continues. A Qatari delegation visited Tehran to examine recent diplomatic developments, including the proposed MoU aimed at ending the conflict. Domestic protests erupted in Mashhad against Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi following his televised comments on the potential agreement. While Trump claimed a deal could be signed Sunday, Iranian officials remain cautious, with spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stating it would not happen immediately.

Tehran's final decision on Memorandum of Understanding with US under review: Iranian Media

Tehran, June 14

Iran has not yet taken a final decision on the Memorandum of Understanding to end the conflict with the US and Israel, as reported by the Iranian news agency Fars.

As per Fars news agency, the review of the political, legal, and technical dimensions of the proposed suggestions is still ongoing.

Meanwhile, a Qatari delegation travelled to Tehran on Sunday to examine the recent developments in diplomatic efforts involving Iran and the United States after last week's talks, according to local Iranian media.

Iranian news agency Tasnim reported that the delegation is in the Iranian capital to examine the latest developments related to the diplomatic process and has held consultations with officials of Iran.

According to ISNA, the delegation is headed by an adviser to Qatar's Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani. The visit is aimed at continuing the exchange of messages between Tehran and Washington regarding a memorandum of understanding (MoU) intended to end the war.

In Iran, dozens of people staged a demonstration outside a foreign ministry office in the north-eastern city of Mashhad, shouting slogans against top diplomat Abbas Araghchi following a televised interview concerning a potential peace agreement with the United States.

This domestic outrage directly followed a broadcast on state television, where Araghchi stated that the proposed agreement includes provisions for dismantling the US naval blockade on Iranian ports, which Washington had instituted following Iran's own blockade in the Strait of Hormuz.

Protesters were seen demanding political exits, chanting "Araghchi, resign" and "Ghalibaf, resign," directed at the foreign minister and parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who is also serving as the chief negotiator.

While Trump and Pakistani officials stated that the deal aimed at concluding the conflict could be finalised as early as Sunday, authorities in Tehran remained highly cautious about the official timeline.

Trump asserted that a framework agreement is anticipated to be signed on Sunday, with Islamabad stating that an electronic signing ceremony is being organised. The Sunday on which Trump

Trump, in a post on Truth Social, said that if the deal doesn't work out, the US has an ultimate alternative.

"Barack Hussein Obama's Deal with Iran, the JCPOA, was an easy, beautiful, smooth road to a Nuclear Weapon, which Iran would have had six years ago, and would have used long before now. My Agreement with Iran is the exact opposite, A WALL TO NO NUCLEAR WEAPON! In fact, they no longer want a Nuclear Weapon, nor will they have one, either through purchase, development, or any other form of procurement. The Deal is scheduled to get signed tomorrow, and immediately after it is signed, the Hormuz Strait is OPEN TO ALL," he said.

Conversely, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei explicitly downplayed an immediate conclusion, stating, "It will not be tomorrow," though he acknowledged that an agreement might still be formalised in the subsequent days.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

Trump's "ultimate alternative" sounds ominous—he's not known for patience. But Iran's cautious approach is wise; they've been burned before with broken promises. India should be wary of any sudden shifts in Gulf stability, as our diaspora and trade links there are massive. Hope Qatar's mediation sticks. 🕊️

Michael C

Typical US grandstanding—Trump announces a deal before it's even signed. Meanwhile, Iran's negotiators are getting heckled at home. This whole thing feels like a high-stakes game of chicken. India should stay neutral but prepared for any outcome, especially with our Chabahar port investments.

Vikram M

The Iranian protesters have a point—why trust the US after the JCPOA fiasco? Obama's deal was sabotaged, and now Trump wants to claim credit for a "wall." India should quietly ensure our oil supply lines aren't disrupted by any last-minute drama. Diplomacy is good, but we need concrete guarantees. 🇮🇳

Sarah B

I'm skeptical. The US keeps flip-flopping on Iran policy, and Iran's internal politics are a mess. The fact that Araghchi is being protested suggests deep mistrust. India's stance of strategic autonomy is the right call—we can't afford to pick a side in this perpetual standoff.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked