Kerala's Masala Bond Mystery: Why a 9.7% Interest Rate Raises Corruption Questions

Kerala's Leader of the Opposition, V.D. Satheesan, has launched a major corruption allegation against the state government. He claims the KIIFB's Masala Bond deal saddled the state with an exorbitant interest rate of 9.7%, leading to a massive interest burden. Satheesan also slammed the recent ED notices as a politically motivated stunt timed around local body polls. He accused former Finance Minister Thomas Isaac of evading responsibility for the controversial financial decision.

Key Points: Satheesan Alleges Corruption in KIIFB Masala Bond Deal, Slams ED Notice

  • Alleged Rs 1,045 crore interest burden on a Rs 2,150 crore loan at 9.7% rate
  • Accused government of bypassing cheaper state sovereign guarantee options
  • Claimed deal violated Article 293(1) and involved a firm linked to SNC-Lavalin
  • Termed ED notices to CM and ex-minister as politically timed intimidation
2 min read

LoP Satheesan alleges violations in Masala Bond deal, terms ED notice a political stunt

Kerala LoP V.D. Satheesan alleges constitutional violations and a Rs 1,045 crore interest burden in the KIIFB Masala Bond deal, terming ED notices a political stunt.

"This is not normal. Nearly half the principal was lost to interest. - V.D. Satheesan"

Kollam, Dec 1

Kerala's Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan launched a scathing attack on the state government on Monday, alleging serious corruption, constitutional violations and financial impropriety in the Masala Bond transaction by the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB).

On the Enforcement Directorate (ED) notices to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and former Finance Minister Thomas Isaac, Satheesan termed the move "politically timed to intimidate" the CPI-M ahead of local body polls.

He said the Opposition had long flagged the "mystery-laden transaction", accusing the government of borrowing Rs 2,150 crore from international markets at a steep 9.723 per cent interest rate, resulting in a total repayment of Rs 3,195 crore in just five years—an interest burden of Rs 1,045 crore.

"This is not normal. Nearly half the principal was lost to interest. Instead of using the state’s sovereign guarantee, which could have secured funding at barely 1.5 per cent interest, the government opted for exorbitant rates," he said.

Satheesan alleged that the deal violated Article 293(1) of the Constitution and involved CDPQ, a firm linked to SNC-Lavalin.

He claimed the much-publicised London Stock Exchange ‘bell-ringing ceremony’—where Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan was projected as the first CM to ring the bell —was a "mere PR drama".

"He rang the bell not as Chief Minister, but as KIIFB Chairman. Such ceremonies are routine for any issuer. There is corruption behind this publicity stunt," he said.

Criticising the timing of the ED notice, he said similar tactics were used during the Karuvannur Bank case before the Thrissur parliamentary polls.

"Central agencies, unlike in other states, won’t take investigations to their logical end in Kerala. They only serve notices to create fear," he alleged.

Calling it a "serious case, not one to be laughed off", Satheesan accused Isaac of distancing himself from responsibility by claiming the decision was the KIIFB’s.

"Public money raised through taxes and cess was used to pay usurious interest. The state exchequer suffered severe losses," he said, adding that the people of Kerala "should not be mocked by shifting narratives".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Ananya R
While the financial details are concerning, the timing of the ED notice is also very suspect. It's become a pattern before every election. Let the agencies investigate properly and give us a clear verdict, not just create noise.
R
Rahul R
The London bell-ringing ceremony was shown on all news channels like a huge achievement. Now it looks like it was just a tamasha to cover up a bad deal. Publicity over substance seems to be the norm.
M
Michael C
As someone who works in finance, the interest rate differential is staggering. A sovereign guarantee is the cheapest form of borrowing. Opting out of it needs a very, very strong justification which hasn't been provided. This requires a transparent, non-political audit.
P
Priya S
Both sides are playing politics with our money. The government needs to answer the financial allegations clearly, and the opposition should focus on the policy failure, not just use it for election rhetoric. We deserve better.
K
Karthik V
SNC-Lavalin connection? That old ghost is back? This makes the whole thing smell even worse. Hope the media follows this properly and doesn't let it fade away after the polls.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50