Key Points

Kim Min-seok has been officially appointed as South Korea's Prime Minister after a contentious National Assembly vote. The ruling party pushed through his confirmation despite opposition boycotts over financial and ethical concerns. Kim pledged to prioritize economic recovery, framing it as a fight against "forces of tyranny." Meanwhile, the Assembly also passed key corporate governance and martial law reforms.

Key Points: Kim Min-seok Confirmed as South Korea PM Amid Opposition Boycott

  • Kim Min-seok confirmed as PM in 173-3 vote despite PPP boycott
  • Opposition cites wealth discrepancies and family scandals
  • PM vows economic recovery as key focus
  • Assembly also passes shareholder rights and martial law reforms
2 min read

Kim Min-seok officially appointed as South Korean PM following National Assembly approval

Four-term lawmaker Kim Min-seok appointed as South Korea's Prime Minister after National Assembly approval, despite PPP opposition over wealth allegations.

"Overcoming the economic crisis caused by forces of tyranny will be my top priority – Kim Min-seok"

Seoul, July 3

Kim Min-seok was officially appointed as South Korea's Prime Minister on Thursday after the National Assembly voted to endorse the four-term ruling party lawmaker picked by President Lee Jae Myung as the first holder of the post under the country's new administration.

Earlier in the day, the Assembly passed the confirmation motion for Kim in a 173-3 vote with three invalid ballots during a plenary session. The motion was boycotted by the main opposition People Power Party (PPP) in protest of allegations surrounding his wealth and family.

Speaking to reporters after his confirmation, Kim pledged to "uphold the will of the people" and stressed that "overcoming the economic crisis" caused by what he called the "forces of tyranny" will be his top priority.

Lee officially appointed Kim as Prime Minister following the parliamentary vote, according to presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung.

The PPP has called Kim an unqualified nominee, taking issue with the source of his income amid large differences between his reported wealth and spending, as well as allegations surrounding his son's college admissions and his own studies at China's Tsinghua University.

The DP earlier said it will push ahead with the confirmation unilaterally even if the PPP disagrees.

In South Korea, the Prime Minister is the only Cabinet post that requires parliamentary approval.

At the session, the Assembly also passed a revision of the Commercial Act that would expand the fiduciary duty of corporate board members to all shareholders.

The rival parties had clashed over the rule that would limit the voting rights of the largest shareholder in a company to 3 per cent when an auditor is being selected, but agreed Wednesday to put the bill to a vote after making amendments to the rule.

Among the 272 lawmakers present, 220 approved of the revision. Twenty-nine disapproved while 23 abstained.

The Assembly had passed a similar bill in March, but it was vetoed by then-President Yoon Suk Yeol and ultimately scrapped, Yonhap news agency reported.

A revision to the Martial Law Act, which bans the entry of the military and police into the National Assembly when martial law is declared, was also passed in Thursday's session.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya M
The wealth allegations remind me of some Indian politicians 😅 But seriously, every country needs transparent leadership. South Korea is an important partner for India - hope this appointment strengthens our bilateral relations in tech and manufacturing sectors.
A
Amit S
The Commercial Act revision sounds progressive! India should also consider similar shareholder protection laws. Our corporate governance needs strengthening too. Maybe Modi government can take notes from this development.
S
Sarah B
As an expat in India, I find it fascinating to compare political systems. The 3% voting limit for largest shareholders is an interesting concept - could prevent corporate monopolies. Wonder if it would work in Indian context?
N
Nikhil R
The "forces of tyranny" comment is concerning. Hope this doesn't mean protectionist policies that could affect Indian businesses in Korea. Our companies like Tata and Mahindra have significant interests there.
K
Kavya P
The Tsinghua University connection caught my eye! With India-China tensions, it's interesting how other countries handle such academic ties. Hope our leaders learn from global examples while maintaining national security.
R
Ramesh V
While the appointment process seems smooth, the opposition boycott raises red flags. In India, we've seen how such political divisions can stall progress. Hope Korea finds better consensus-building methods than we sometimes

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50