Key Points

The Kerala High Court has ordered that the birth certificate of the child of transgender parents Zahhad and Ziya should be updated to list both as just 'parent' without gender specifications. Initially, the Kozhikode Corporation declined their request, prompting the couple to seek legal action. The court's ruling highlights the evolving recognition of transgender rights in India's legal system, aligning with guidelines set by landmark cases such as NALSA. This decision is seen as a progressive step in ensuring dignity and fundamental rights for transgender families in Kerala.

Key Points: Kerala HC Removes Gender Terms on Trans Couple's Birth Certificate

  • Zahhad and Ziya are Kerala's first transgender parents
  • Kozhikode Corporation initially denied their request
  • HC ruling allows only 'parent' designation for both
  • Move aligns with rights directives from the NALSA case
3 min read

Kerala HC rules transgender parents be designated just 'parent' in child's birth certificate

Kerala HC rules for Zahhad and Ziya, allows 'parent' designation in birth certificate.

"Directing the fifth respondent to issue a birth certificate with the modification. - Justice A.A.Ziyad Rahman"

Kochi, June 2

The Kerala High Court on Monday ordered that the gender details of Kerala's first transgender parents in their child's birth certificate be changed from "mother" and "father" to just "parent" for both partners.

While the Pinarayi Vijayan government often says it is the first state government to have come out with a transgender policy, the transgender parents failed to get justice from the CPI-M ruled Kozhikode Corporation when they first approached it to modify their child's certificate, and then, took legal recourse.

A bench of Justice A.A.Ziyad Rahman passed the order on the plea by Zahhad, a transman (assigned female at birth but identifying as a man) and Ziya Paval, a transwoman (assigned male at birth but identifying as a woman), who are the first openly transgender couple in Kerala.

"This writ petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent to issue a birth certificate with the modification by removing the columns of names of father and mother and by incorporating the names of the petitioners as parents without referring to their genders," the court ruled.

The transgender couple was in the news in February 2023 when Zahad gave birth to their child.

The birth certificate of the child registered by the Kozhikode Corporation recorded the mother's name as Zahad (transgender) and the father's name as Ziya (transgender).

Zahad and Ziya approached the Corporation to change the details in their child's birth certificate to indicate both of them as just 'parents' rather than mother and father.

But the Corporation authorities rejected their request, and the couple then approached the High Court seeking relief.

"Since scientifically there’s some contradiction in the fact that a male is giving birth to a child, the petitioners requested the authorities to avoid the name of father and mother but simply writing ‘parent’ to avoid further embarrassment which the third petitioner (child) would have to face during her life time viz. school admission, Adhar Card, PAN Card, Passport and various other documents including job and connected matters," the parents contended.

They also pointed out that the denial of such a certificate is a denial of their and their child's fundamental rights.

Moreover, the denial of the new certificate goes against the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in the landmark NALSA case.

They further added that various other countries allow couples, especially same sex couples, to choose their title in their child's birth certificate from among 'mother', 'father' and 'parent'.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Kerala continues to lead in progressive reforms! This judgment respects individual dignity while protecting the child's future. Our legal system must evolve with changing social realities. 👏
P
Priya M.
While I support LGBTQ+ rights, I wonder how this will work in practical situations like school admissions where traditional parent formats are expected. The court should have provided clearer implementation guidelines.
A
Arjun S.
This is a landmark judgment! But why did the Corporation reject their request initially? Government offices need sensitivity training about gender diversity. Kerala's transgender policy means nothing if ground-level officers don't implement it.
S
Sunita R.
As a parent myself, I completely understand their concern for the child's future. No child should face embarrassment because of bureaucratic paperwork. More power to this brave couple! ❤️
V
Vikram J.
The court has balanced tradition with modernity here. Using 'parent' is neutral and practical. But we need nationwide standardization - what if this family moves to another state? Center should make uniform guidelines.
N
Neha T.
While progressive, this might create confusion in inheritance and succession matters where mother/father distinction matters legally. The judgment should have addressed these aspects too. Progress must be holistic.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50