Fri, 12 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Oct 7, 2025 · 21:52
Kerala News Updated Oct 7, 2025

Kerala HC asks Mammootty's actor son to approach Customs for provisional release of confiscated vehicle

The Kerala High Court has asked Dulquer Salmaan to follow proper Customs procedures for his seized vehicle. The court emphasized that investigations are still ongoing and won't be interrupted. Dulquer maintains he purchased the Land Rover legally five years ago with proper documentation. The vehicle's history includes original importation by the Red Cross before changing hands through authorized channels.

Kochi, Oct 7

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday directed Mammootty’s actor son Dulquer Salmaan to approach the adjudicating authority under the Customs Act, 1962, for the provisional release of his Land Rover Defender, seized by Customs officials as part of 'Operation Numkhor'.

A bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., while hearing a writ petition filed by the actor, said the investigation into the alleged irregularities was still at a preliminary stage and that the court would not interfere with the probe at this juncture.

The court observed that the question of interim custody of the seized vehicle must be considered under Section 110A of the Customs Act, which allows the owner to seek provisional release subject to furnishing security and conditions determined by the competent authority.

"In such circumstances, it is ordered that, in case the petitioner submits an application under Section 110A, the same shall be considered by the competent authority and appropriate orders shall be passed within one week," it said.

The bench added that the authority should provide the petitioner or his representative an opportunity to be heard and take into account that the vehicle had been used and registered by various authorities over the past two decades.

It further clarified that since provisional release is a statutory right under normal circumstances, any rejection of the application must be made through a speaking order, detailing the reasons and referring to the documents and submissions produced.

In his petition, the actor stated that he had purchased the vehicle five years ago from Aarpee Promoters Pvt. Ltd., paying through formal banking channels.

He claimed ownership in good faith, supported by customs clearance, invoices, and delivery documents.

The vehicle was originally imported by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), New Delhi, according to the bill of entry and invoice from Land Rover and Ford.

Section 110A has been introduced to protect bona fide owners, allowing provisional release of seized property during an investigation, balancing the right to possession with the government’s enforcement powers under customs law.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Rohit P

Why are celebrities always in these customs controversies? 🤔 If he bought it through proper channels with all documents, then Customs should release it quickly. But if there's wrongdoing, no one should be spared!

Sarah B

As someone who's dealt with customs clearance for imported goods, I appreciate that the court emphasized the need for a "speaking order" if they reject his application. Transparency is crucial in such matters.

Arjun K

The vehicle was originally imported by Red Cross? That's interesting. Hope the investigation is fair and quick. Dulquer is a talented actor and seems like a decent person. Hope this gets resolved soon! 🙏

Michael C

While I respect the court's decision, I feel the process is unnecessarily complicated for someone who claims to have all proper documents. The system should work efficiently for common citizens too, not just create bureaucratic hurdles.

Kavya N

Operation Numkhor seems to be targeting high-profile cases. Good that customs is doing their job, but hope they're equally strict with all tax evaders, not just celebrities who are easy targets.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked