Fri, 12 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 16, 2025 · 17:49
Kerala News Updated Jul 16, 2025

KEAM row: SC refuses to stay Kerala HC order, admissions to proceed as per revised rank list

The Supreme Court refused to stay the Kerala High Court’s order revising the KEAM rank list, allowing admissions to proceed. The controversy arose after the state government altered the marks ratio, disadvantaging CBSE and ICSE students. While the legal question remains unresolved, the admission process will continue without delay. The court will examine the matter further in four weeks.

New Delhi, July 16

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made it very clear that it will not interfere with this year's admission process based on the revised marks list of the Kerala Engineering Architecture Medical (KEAM) entrance exam.

Last week, first the Kerala High Court single bench and then a division bench dismissed the state government’s appeal challenging the single bench’s verdict.

The single bench had annulled the KEAM rank list published on July 1.

The high court maintained that the last-minute change in the eligibility criteria was unjustified and directed the authorities to revert to the original prospectus and issue a revised rank list.

The controversy erupted after the state government issued a Government Order (GO) on July 1 -- the same day the rank list was published -- altering the evaluation formula.

As per the amended criteria, the ratio of marks for Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry was changed from 1:1:1 to 5:3:2, effectively affecting students from CBSE and ICSE backgrounds, who alleged that the change was biased and arbitrary.

With a double blow, the Pinarayi Vijayan government decided not to appeal against the division bench verdict and started to go forward with the allotment. A group of students studying in the Kerala Syllabus approached the Supreme Court seeking a stay of the high court decision.

The only positive that came out from Wednesday’s decision was that the apex court agreed to hear 'the question of law' raised regarding the power to change the formula to standardise the marks of different boards.

Despite a passionate plea from the counsel of the petitioners for an urgent hearing next week, the bench posted the matter after four weeks, asking the state to file its counter.

The court was also informed that the counsel for the Vijayan government was not filing any petition against the High Court's order, as it does not want to delay the admission process.

"Let me make it clear, we wanted to file an appeal, but we didn't want to upset the process," said the counsel.

With this curtain comes down on the issue. The question of law is to be examined next month, but by then the admission process will be on.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

As a parent, I'm relieved the admission process won't be delayed further. Our children have suffered enough stress already. But the government must be more careful with policy changes affecting students' futures. #EducationMatters

Rohit P

While I support the HC decision, I wonder why the Supreme Court didn't take up the matter urgently? The 'question of law' is important for future cases. 4 weeks is too long when academic sessions are at stake 😕

Sarah B

This shows how political interference can mess with education. Changing evaluation criteria on result day? Seriously? Kudos to judiciary for protecting students' rights. Hope other states learn from this episode.

Vikram M

The government's U-turn is disappointing. First they make changes favoring state board students, then don't even properly defend their decision in SC. Shows lack of planning in education policy making. #Disappointed

Kavya N

As a teacher, I see both sides. Standardization across boards is needed, but last-minute changes create chaos. Maybe NCERT should develop a common national syllabus to prevent such issues 🤔 Education should be above politics!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked