Key Points

The JPC on 'One Nation One Election' is holding state-wise meetings to gather stakeholder feedback, with Mumbai next on May 19. Maharashtra officials, RBI, and political leaders like Prithviraj Chavan shared concerns over constitutional and economic implications. Financial institutions will study how simultaneous polls could affect policy and credit systems. The committee aims to finalize recommendations after transparent nationwide consultations.

Key Points: JPC on One Nation One Election to Hold Mumbai Meeting May 19

  • JPC engages Maharashtra officials on simultaneous polls impact
  • RBI and banks to study economic effects of electoral cycles
  • Political parties share constitutional and logistical concerns
  • Committee aims for transparent nationwide stakeholder consultations
3 min read

JPC to hold 'One Nation, One Election' meetings across states,; next in Mumbai on May 19: PP Choudhary

BJP MP PP Choudhary leads JPC's nationwide 'One Nation One Election' consultations, with next meeting in Mumbai to discuss feasibility and challenges.

"The committee has decided to go to every state and take the opinion of stakeholders with complete transparency. - PP Choudhary"

Mumbai, May 17

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP and Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on 'One Nation, One Election', PP Choudhary, stated that the committee will be holding meetings in every state to discuss the proposal and clear doubts. The next meeting is scheduled to take place in Mumbai on May 19.

"In these meetings, there is interaction and experts clear the doubts of the members about 'One Nation One Election'... The committee has decided to go to every state and take the opinion of the stakeholders with complete transparency...The next meeting will be held on May 19 in Mumbai ...," he said.

According to an official statement released, the Joint Committee on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, conducted extensive consultations with key stakeholders in Maharashtra regarding the feasibility and implications of One Nation One election (ONOE).

The Committee held in-depth discussions with officials from the Maharashtra State Government, senior state bureaucrats, and representatives of national and regional political parties. The deliberations focused on the potential administrative and economic impact of holding simultaneous elections. Senior state officials assured the Committee that a thorough study would be undertaken to assess the broader outcomes, particularly in sectors such as education, the statement said.

During the visit, the Committee also met with representatives of political parties in Maharashtra, including Prithviraj Chavan, former Chief Minister of the state. Party representatives shared their views on constitutional, logistical, and related challenges associated with simultaneous elections.

The statement added that in a separate session, the Committee interacted with officials from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to understand the implications of unsynchronised elections on monetary policy. RBI officials informed the Committee that a comprehensive study would be conducted to evaluate the effects of simultaneous elections on policy formulation and economic uncertainty caused by frequent electoral cycles.

The Committee also engaged with representatives from major financial institutions, including the State Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Bank of India, Union Bank of India, Life Insurance Corporation (LIC), General Insurance Corporation (GIC), and NABARD. The discussions centred on the potential impact of simultaneous elections on the country's banking sector and credit culture. These institutions assured the Committee that, under the aegis of the Indian Banks' Association, a holistic study would be initiated and its findings submitted to the Committee.

The Joint Committee aims to incorporate these insights into its report, guiding the way forward on the complex issue of electoral reforms and the feasibility of simultaneous elections in India, the statement added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rahul K.
Finally some serious discussion on electoral reforms! Frequent elections disrupt governance and cost taxpayers thousands of crores. Hope all political parties keep national interest above politics 🤞 The Mumbai meeting should address Maharashtra's unique local body election challenges too.
P
Priya M.
While the idea sounds good, I'm concerned about regional parties getting overshadowed in simultaneous elections. The JPC must ensure federal structure isn't weakened. Good that they're consulting RBI - economic stability is crucial 🇮🇳
A
Arjun S.
One Nation One Election is need of the hour! Our teachers/students suffer most during election months when schools become polling booths. Hope the Mumbai meeting discusses this aspect properly. Less disruption = better education outcomes 👍
S
Sunita P.
The concept is good but implementation will be nightmare! What if state govt falls mid-term? Also, Election Commission will need massive infrastructure upgrade. Hope they're discussing these practical issues in Mumbai meetings.
V
Vikram J.
As Mumbai citizen, I welcome this discussion. Our city comes to standstill during elections - traffic chaos, security protocols affect daily life. But concerned about cost-benefit analysis. Hope they release white paper after all state consultations.
N
Neha T.
Why only political parties and bankers? Common voters' opinions matter most! JPC should hold open townhalls where regular citizens can share views. Democracy isn't just about experts and politicians 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50