NewKerala.com

Kerala VC Deadlock Deepens: Why Supreme Court May Step In Amid Governor-Govt Standoff

The standoff between Kerala's Governor and the state government over appointing Vice Chancellors has hit another wall. Despite a meeting initiated after the Supreme Court's stern observations, both sides refused to budge from their positions. The Governor is pushing his own candidates while questioning the Chief Minister's absence and the priority of his recommendations. With talks failing again, the Supreme Court is now poised to potentially step in and make the appointments itself to resolve the constitutional tussle.

Key Points: Kerala Governor Govt Deadlock on VC Appointments Heads to Supreme Court

  • High-level talks between state ministers and Governor Rajendra Arlekar ended without a breakthrough
  • Governor questioned why Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan did not attend the reconciliation meeting
  • The dispute centers on conflicting nominees for two key university Vice Chancellor posts
  • Supreme Court has warned it may directly appoint VCs if the deadlock persists
2 min read

Guv–Govt deadlock on Kerala VC appointments deepens, apex court likely to step in

Talks fail between Kerala Governor and Pinarayi Vijayan govt over VC appointments. Supreme Court warns it may intervene to break the constitutional impasse.

"If no consensus is reached... the court would itself proceed with the Vice Chancellor appointments. - Justice J.B. Pardiwala"

Thiruvananthapuram Dec 10

The standoff between Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar and the Pinarayi Vijayan government over the appointment of Vice Chancellors to the Technological and Digital Universities deepened on Wednesday after high-level talks failed to yield any consensus.

Law Minister P. Rajeev and Higher Education Minister R. Bindu met the Governor at the Lok Bhavan as part of a reconciliation effort initiated following stern observations by the Supreme Court.

However, the hour-long meeting ended without a breakthrough, with both sides sticking firmly to their positions.

Governor Arlekar reiterated that the candidates he had proposed were fully qualified and questioned the Ministers on why Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan did not attend the discussions.

He also said he was not given a clear explanation of how the Chief Minister determined the order of priority in his recommendations.

The dispute escalated after the Governor recently filed a fresh affidavit in the Supreme Court opposing the Chief Minister's nominees.

While the Chief Minister had recommended C. Satheesh Kumar for the Kerala Technological University and Saji Gopinath for the Digital University, the Governor insisted on appointing Ciza Thomas to the Technological University and Dr Priya Chandran to the Digital University.

The Governor was unhappy with the Chief Minister for sidelining merit and excluding Thomas.

The Supreme Court, which is hearing the case, has expressed strong displeasure at the continuing deadlock.

A bench headed by Justice J.B. Pardiwala warned that if no consensus is reached based on the lists submitted by the two search committees headed by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, the court would itself proceed with the Vice Chancellor appointments.

The state government has maintained that appointments must be made strictly from the panel submitted by the Chief Minister, while asserting its willingness for a negotiated settlement.

With the latest round of talks also failing, all eyes are now on the Supreme Court, whose next move is expected to decisively shape the outcome of the high-profile constitutional tussle.

To cool things down, Rajeeve, after the failed meeting with the Governor, said discussions would continue.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
The Governor is right to question why the CM didn't attend. If this is such a high-level issue, the top person should be in the room. How can you expect a breakthrough when you send ministers while staying away yourself? It shows a lack of seriousness from the government's side.
R
Rohit P
Merit should be the only criteria! If the Governor's nominees are more qualified, they should be appointed. We cannot let our universities become political appointments. The future of our tech students is at stake. Let the best candidate win, regardless of who recommends them.
S
Sarah B
As someone who works in academia, this is a deeply frustrating pattern. These appointments are critical for research direction and institutional reputation. The continuous deadlock between governors and state governments across India is harming higher education. The Supreme Court needs to set a clear, lasting precedent.
V
Vikram M
This is not just a Kerala issue. We see this in Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Punjab... The role of the Governor needs to be clearly defined. Are they a rubber stamp or an active participant? The constitution is clear, but the interpretation keeps changing with the party in power at the centre. The SC's decision will be crucial for all states.
N
Nikhil C
Respectfully, I think the government is on shaky ground here. If they have a clear, merit-based order of priority, they should explain it transparently. The Governor asking for that explanation is his duty. "My way or the highway" is not how cooperative federalism works.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50