NewKerala.com

Key Points

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued a strong advisory to food companies against using "100 per cent" in food labeling and promotions. This term, according to FSSAI, is misleading and can create false impressions about product superiority. The advisory emphasizes that such claims are not defined under existing regulations and can impact consumer decisions negatively. FSSAI's action follows a past ruling against Dabur for misleading claims in their beverages.

Key Points: FSSAI Criticizes Misleading '100pc' Labeling by Food Companies

  • FSSAI criticizes '100pc' label use citing consumer misinformation risk
  • Term not defined under current food safety regulations
  • Advisory impacts all food business operators
2 min read

Food companies must not use '100pc' claim in labelling and promotions: FSSAI

FSSAI advises against '100pc' labels, citing potential consumer misinformation risks.

"This could mislead consumers into believing that other comparable products in the market are inferior or non-compliant with regulatory standards. - FSSAI advisor"

New Delhi, May 30

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued a strong advisory to food companies against the use of the term "100 per cent" in food labelling, citing concerns over its potential to mislead consumers.

“Refrain from using the term on food labels, packaging, and promotional content, owing to its ambiguity and potential for misinterpretation within the existing regulatory provisions,” read the advisor to all Food Business Operators (FBOs).

In the advisory issued, the apex food regulator highlighted a noticeable surge in the use of the term "100 across" across food product labels and promotional platforms.

“Such terminology is not only undefined under current regulations but also misleading and likely to create a false impression among consumers,” the FSSAI said.

As per the Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018, the term "100 per cent" is not defined or referenced in any manner under the FSS Act, 2006, or the Rules and Regulations made thereunder.

Furthermore, Sub-regulation 10(7) of the aforementioned regulations strictly prohibits any advertisement or claim that undermines other manufacturers or misleadingly influences consumer perception. As per Sub-regulation 4(1) it shall be ensured that the Claims must be truthful, unambiguous, meaningful, not misleading and help consumers to comprehend the information provided, FSSAI said.

The use of the term "100 per cent"-whether in isolation or combined with other descriptors is likely to create a false impression of absolute purity or superiority.

“This could mislead consumers into believing that other comparable products in the market are inferior or non-compliant with regulatory standards,” the food regulatory body said.

The food regulator, had, in June 2024 issued a notification directing FBOs to remove claims such as "100 per cent fruit juices" from the label and advertisement of fruit juices.

Earlier in April, the FSSAI informed the Delhi High Court that the claim made by FMCG giant Dabur that its range of fruit beverages is made “100 per cent” from fruits violates rules and regulations and is also misleading for the consumers.

The writ petition challenged Dabur against the “100 per cent” claim stating that the juices contain water and fruit concentrates. In addition, the term “100 per cent” is also not recognised for food products.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Finally! These companies have been fooling us for years with their "100% pure" claims. I bought a juice last week that said 100% natural but had preservatives listed in ingredients. FSSAI is doing right by consumers 👍
P
Priya M.
As a mother, I always check labels carefully. But terms like "100% fruit juice" are very confusing. Many parents think they're giving healthy drinks to kids when actually it's just sugar water with some concentrate. Good move by FSSAI!
A
Arjun S.
While I agree with the intention, FSSAI should focus more on actual food safety issues rather than just labeling. Our street food has worse hygiene but gets no attention. Priorities should be balanced.
S
Sunita R.
Companies like Dabur have built trust over decades. If they say 100%, we believe them. Now FSSAI says it's false? Very disappointing 😞 They should be fined heavily for misleading consumers.
V
Vikram J.
This is why I only drink nimbu pani made at home! At least I know exactly what's going into it. These packaged drinks are all marketing gimmicks. FSSAI should also check "no added sugar" claims next!
N
Neha T.
The regulation is good but implementation is key. Will FSSAI actually penalize big companies or just small vendors? We've seen many rules being ignored before. Hope this time there's proper enforcement 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50