Key Points

The CM also reiterated the BJP's commitment to uphold the dignity of the judiciary after the party distanced itself from Nishikant Dubey's controversial statement.

Taking to X, Sarma wrote, "The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has consistently upheld the independence and dignity of the judiciary as a cornerstone of India's democracy. Recently, Hon'ble BJP President Shri JP Nadda ji reaffirmed this commitment by distancing the party from remarks made by Hon'ble MP Shri Nishikant Dubey ji concerning the Supreme Court. Adarniya Nadda Ji emphasised that these were personal opinions and not reflective of the party's stance, reiterating the BJP's deep respect for judicial institutions."

He also mentioned, "While the BJP maintains this principled position, it is pertinent to examine the Congress Party's historical interactions with the judiciary. The Congress has, on multiple occasions, publicly criticised esteemed members of the judiciary: - Justice Dipak Misra: Faced an unprecedented impeachment motion initiated by Congress and other opposition parties, alleging misconduct without substantial evidence. - Justice Ranjan Gogoi: Subjected to severe criticism following landmark judgments, including the Ayodhya verdict. - Justice Arun Mishra: Targeted for his judicial decisions and alleged proximity to the executive, despite his adherence to constitutional duties. -Justice D.Y. Chandrachud: Faced undue scrutiny over his interpretations in significant cases, reflecting a pattern of disapproval when verdicts didn't align with certain political expectations. - Justice S. Abdul Nazeer: Criticised by the Congress for his appointment as the Governor of Andhra Pradesh shortly after retirement, alleging it threatened judicial independence, despite similar appointments in the past."

Sarma argued that the pattern suggests a tendency within the Congress Party to challenge the judiciary's credibility when decisions are unfavourable to their political narrative. Such selective criticism not only undermines the sanctity of judicial processes but also sets a concerning precedent for democratic discourse.

"It's imperative for all political entities to approach judicial pronouncements with consistency and integrity. Respecting the judiciary shouldn't be contingent upon the favourability of its decisions. Selective approbation erodes public trust and the foundational principles of our democracy. In conclusion, while the BJP continues to honour the judiciary's role impartially, it's crucial for opposition parties to reflect on their approach, ensuring that critiques are rooted in principle rather than expediency," he added.

- IANS