Sun, 14 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated May 12, 2025 · 21:03
UK News Updated May 12, 2025

Britain doubles residency requirement for permanent settlement to 10 years

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has dramatically transformed the UK's immigration landscape by extending the permanent residency requirement to 10 years. This significant policy shift represents a stark departure from previous immigration approaches, reflecting a more controlled migration strategy. The new rules demand higher skill levels and stronger language proficiency from potential settlers. By implementing these changes, Starmer signals a pragmatic approach to managing immigration that prioritizes national economic interests.

London, May 12

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday morning that the residency period required to obtain permanent settlement in Britain has been extended from five to 10 years.

Alongside this measure, the government is also increasing the skill thresholds for migrant workers, raising the degree level required, and tightening the English language requirements.

"When people come to our country, they should also commit to integration, to learning our language," Starmer stated. "And our system should actively distinguish between those that do and those that don't. I think that's fair."

He noted that fewer people are currently making a strong economic contribution. Starmer also said the Labour government would "finally honour what 'take back control' meant and begin to choose who comes here so that migration works for our national interest."

When asked by local media whether he had "shot himself in the foot" by requiring migrants to live in the country twice as long before becoming eligible for citizenship, Starmer responded: "The theory that higher migration numbers lead to growth has been tested in the last four years."

"That link doesn't hold on that evidence," he noted, Xinhua news agency reported.

The Labour Party has historically been more open to immigration. However, since the party lost power after the 2010 General Election, it has recalibrated its policies and shifted to a stricter stance.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Rajiv K.

This will hit many Indian students and professionals hard. UK was already becoming less attractive compared to Canada/Australia. Now with 10 years wait, our youth will think twice before choosing Britain. 🇮🇳✈️

Priya M.

While I understand Britain's need to control immigration, doubling the residency period seems excessive. Many Indians contribute significantly to UK economy - from NHS doctors to tech professionals. Hope they make exceptions for skilled workers.

Arjun S.

Interesting how Labour has changed its stance! Shows even liberal parties can't ignore public sentiment on immigration. India should also learn - we need balanced policies that protect our interests while being welcoming to genuine talent.

Sunita R.

My cousin in London says Indians there are worried. Many have elderly parents back home and planned to bring them after getting PR in 5 years. Now they'll have to wait 10 years? This is heartbreaking for families. 💔

Vikram J.

Maybe this will encourage more Indians to build careers in India itself. With our growing economy, why run after foreign countries that keep changing rules? "Make in India" should apply to careers too!

Neha T.

The English language requirement increase is fair - if you're settling in a country, you should learn its language properly. But 10 years is too long. Most Indians integrate well and contribute from day one. UK is losing out on talent with this policy.

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments on Britain's new immigration policy: We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked