Key Points

A lawyer's attempt to hurl a shoe at Chief Justice BR Gavai has sparked nationwide condemnation from political leaders. Union Minister Ramdas Athawale called it disrespect to the Constitution and demanded action under the Atrocity Act. The incident occurred after the CJI dismissed a plea concerning the Javari temple structure in Khajuraho. Multiple politicians including Karnataka's Home Minister and Telangana's K Kavitha have condemned the attack while praising the CJI's composed response.

Key Points: Ramdas Athawale Condemns Shoe Attack Attempt on CJI BR Gavai

  • Union Minister demands legal action against lawyer under Atrocity Act for constitutional disrespect
  • Incident occurred after CJI dismissed plea about Lord Vishnu temple structure
  • Multiple political leaders across parties condemn the attack attempt on judiciary
  • Lawyer Rakesh Kishore shows no regret for his controversial courtroom action
  • Shiv Sena MP calls it broader reflection of political climate ignoring Constitution
2 min read

This amounts to disrespecting Constitution: Ramdas Athawale condemns shoe-hurling attempt on CJI

Union Minister Ramdas Athawale demands action under Atrocity Act after lawyer attempts to hurl shoe at Chief Justice of India, calling it constitutional disrespect

"This amounts to disrespecting the Constitution of India...I condemn this incident. The lawyers who threw an object should be booked under the Atrocity Act - Ramdas Athawale"

New Delhi, October 7

Union Minister Ramdas Athawale on Tuesday condemned the incident where a lawyer attempted to hurl a shoe at Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, terming it a "disrespect to the Constitution of India."

"This amounts to disrespecting the Constitution of India...I condemn this incident. The lawyers who threw an object should be booked under the Atrocity Act," Athawale told ANI.

Lawyer Rakesh Kishore, who attempted to hurl a shoe at the CJI, invited criticism from several political leaders.

Earlier today, Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara condemned the incident, calling it an "insult" to the office and the Constitution.

Speaking with reporters, Parameshwara said that the action should have been taken against the lawyer who attempted to stage a show at the CJI.

Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut claimed the incident was not just about the CJI but a broader reflection of the current political climate, where those in power disregard the Constitution and their followers resort to such acts."The shoe has not been thrown or attempted to be thrown at CJI BR Gavai, but rather it was an attempt to throw the shoe at the Constitution of India. The people in power are not ready to follow the Constitution of India, and their followers are doing these kinds of things," Raut said.

Meanwhile, Rakesh Kishore said that he does not regret his action.

Speaking to ANI on Tuesday, Kishore said that he was hurt by the CJI's remarks while dismissing a plea seeking restoration of the structure of Lord Vishnu in the Javari temple in Khajuraho.

Telangana Jagruthi President K Kavitha also condemned the incident.

Praising the CJI's demeanour in handling the situation, she said that Justice Gavai's reaction shows the "solid base" of the Indian justice system.

Kavitha told ANI, "It's a very unfortunate development, and I don't think that should have ever happened. But I also saw how the CJI has reacted, which speaks volumes about the solid base on which the Indian justice system is thriving so far, and I hope it will continue to do so."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I don't support the shoe-hurling attempt, we must also ask why a lawyer would resort to such extreme measures. The judiciary should be more accessible to common citizens. Sometimes frustration builds up when people feel their voices aren't heard.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in India for 5 years now, I'm shocked by this incident. In my country, such behavior towards the Chief Justice would lead to immediate arrest. The Constitution and judiciary must be respected above all political differences.
A
Arjun K
The lawyer says he doesn't regret his action? This shows complete disregard for our institutions. Whether it's about temple structure or any other issue, there are proper channels to address grievances. Such hooliganism has no place in a democracy.
K
Kavya N
I agree with K Kavitha - Justice Gavai's calm response shows the strength of our judiciary. In a country where emotions often run high, maintaining dignity in such situations is commendable. Our courts have always been the guardians of our Constitution.
M
Michael C
While condemning the act, I must say that political leaders from all sides are quick to comment but slow to address the root causes of such frustrations. The justice system needs reforms to be more efficient and accessible to ordinary citizens.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50