Iran Rejects US Pressure, Says No Talks Under Threat or Coercion

Iran's ambassador to Pakistan declared that Tehran will not engage in negotiations under threat or force, emphasizing this as a fundamental principle. The statement comes amid a fragile ceasefire and indirect talks mediated by Pakistan between Iran and the United States. Senior Iranian officials, including the parliament speaker and foreign minister, echoed this stance, condemning US "provocative actions" and ceasefire violations as obstacles to peace. Iran's participation in further diplomacy is contingent on Washington meeting preconditions and changing its behavior.

Key Points: Iran Refuses Negotiations Under Threat, Envoy Says

  • Iran rejects negotiations under coercion
  • Fragile ceasefire holds after 40-day fight
  • US actions cited as major obstacle
  • Tehran's attendance depends on preconditions
2 min read

Tehran will not negotiate under threat or force: Iranian envoy

Iranian envoy states Tehran will not negotiate under threat or force, citing US actions as obstacles to peace talks amid fragile ceasefire.

"a single country in possession of a large civilisation will not negotiate under threat and force - Reza Amiri Moghadam"

Washington, April 21

Iran's Ambassador to Pakistan Reza Amiri Moghadam said on Tuesday that negotiations cannot take place under threat or coercion, underscoring Tehran's stance amid ongoing diplomatic efforts involving the United States.

In a post on X, the envoy said, "a single country in possession of a large civilisation will not negotiate under threat and force," saying the position is a substantial principle.

The remarks come at a time when a ceasefire that took effect on April 8 after 40 days of fighting remains fragile. Pakistan has mediated indirect talks between Tehran and Washington, hosting a first round in Islamabad on April 11 and 12, but Iran has not confirmed participation in another round, reports Xinhua news agency.

Earlier in the day, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also said that Tehran will not accept negotiations under the "shadow of threats".

Taking to X, Ghalibaf said, "Trump, by imposing a siege and violating the ceasefire, seeks to turn this negotiating table -- in his own imagination -- into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering."

"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threats, and in the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," he added.

Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said that US "provocative actions" and ceasefire violations are major obstacles to continuing peace negotiations between the two countries.

During separate phone calls with his Pakistani and Russian counterparts, Araghchi condemned US actions against Iranian commercial shipping, including the reported seizure of the container vessel Touska and its crew, and cited "contradictory positions and rhetoric of threat" from Washington, according to a Foreign Ministry statement.

Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran's attendance depends on Washington meeting preconditions. It cited a US naval blockade and "excessive demands" as key obstacles.

Araghchi said Iran would decide whether to continue diplomacy based on "all aspects of the issue" and US behaviour, adding that Tehran would take steps to protect its interests and national security.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
This is a very delicate situation. Pakistan's role as a mediator is interesting, but the preconditions from Iran make progress seem difficult. Hope diplomacy wins, for regional stability. The last thing anyone needs is more conflict.
A
Aditya G
As an Indian, I see parallels with how big powers sometimes treat us. We also have to constantly assert our strategic autonomy. Iran's stance on not negotiating under threat is a principle every nation with self-respect should uphold. 💪
P
Priyanka N
While I understand Iran's position, I hope they also consider the humanitarian cost of continued tension. The common people suffer the most in these geopolitical games. A peaceful resolution should be the ultimate goal for all sides.
M
Michael C
The report mentions "preparing to reveal new cards on the battlefield." That sounds like escalation, not de-escalation. Both sides need to step back from brinkmanship. The seizure of commercial ships is a serious provocation that blocks dialogue.
K
Kavya N
India has vital interests in the region, from energy security to the welfare of our diaspora. This instability is worrying. We need a neutral and strong voice for peace. Maybe India can also play a quiet diplomatic role behind the scenes?

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50