Fri, 21 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 13, 2026 · 13:55
Andhra Pradesh News Updated Aug 13, 2026

YSRCP Leader YV Subba Reddy Demands Halt to Mining Near Panchadarla Heritage in Rajya Sabha

YV Subba Reddy, YSRCP Parliamentary Party Leader, raised the Panchadarla mining issue in Rajya Sabha during the Minerals Amendment Bill discussion. He highlighted threats to the Buddhist site and Dharmalingeswara Swamy temple from nearby mining activity. He demanded an immediate inspection, environmental impact assessment, and hydrological study of the water streams. He also called for suspension of mining until all studies are completed and stressed protecting state revenues and local livelihoods.

YSRCP's YV Subba Reddy raises Panchadarla mining issue in Rajya Sabha

New Delhi, August 13

Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party Parliamentary Party Leader YV Subba Reddy on Thursday raised the issue of mining activity near the historic Panchadarla heritage area in Andhra Pradesh in the Rajya Sabha and sought immediate intervention to protect the ancient sites and natural water streams.

According to the YSRCP press release, speaking during the discussion on the Minerals Amendment Bill, 2026, Subba Reddy drew the attention of the House to mining activity close to the protected Buddhist site and the ancient Dharmalingeswara Swamy temple at Panchadarla.

He said the identity of Panchadarla is closely linked to the five natural water streams flowing through the temple complex. He expressed concern over mining activity moving closer to the protected heritage area.

Subba Reddy sought an immediate inspection of the area, a comprehensive cumulative environmental impact assessment and a scientific hydrological study of the water channels. He also called for verification of all statutory and environmental clearances.

He demanded suspension of mining activities and related plans in the area until the inspections and studies are completed.

Speaking on the Minerals Amendment Bill, Subba Reddy said mineral wealth belongs to the people and its management should ensure complete transparency.

He said a clear mining framework is important for economic growth, but it should not compromise State revenues, local livelihoods or environmental protection.

Subba Reddy pointed out that States bear the immediate financial, environmental and infrastructure costs arising from mining. Their interests and revenues should therefore be protected while framing mining policies.

He also cautioned that centralisation of authority at the national level should not weaken enforcement on the ground against illegal and environmentally destructive mining activities.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

Finally someone is speaking up for the environment! But I want to know who gave the mining clearances in the first place? Villagers around Panchadarla have been complaining about groundwater depletion and dust pollution for years. We keep making laws but enforcement on ground is weak. Sad state of affairs.

Arjun K

This is a typical political drama - YSRCP MP raising mining issue while their own state government is accused of giving clearances. Even if there's a genuine concern, the opposition and ruling parties are in same boat. But heritage is heritage - we should protect what's left.

Sneha F

Environmental impact assessment is the bare minimum requirement. We are losing our ancient temples and natural water sources in the name of development. Panchadarla was a flourishing Buddhist centre more than 2000 years ago. If mining activity is allowed so close, it's like destroying our roots. 🙏

James A

It's encouraging to see Indian parliamentarians raise environmental concerns. The balance between mineral development and cultural preservation is delicate. Hopefully the inspection and studies mentioned get completed quickly before irreparable damage occurs.

Varun X

The problem is not just Panchadarla - it's the pattern across several states. Mining companies follow no norms once they get clearances. Subba Reddy's demand for cumulative environmental impact assessment is absolutely right. Single project assessments miss out on cumulative damage. Good point raised!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked