NewKerala.com

Why West Should Avoid China's "Pressure Cooker" Industrial Model

A new report analyzes China's industrial rise as a system of "regionally decentralised authoritarianism," where institutionalized competition among provinces and firms is steered by the central government. It argues this "state-enabled pressure cooker" model is inseparable from China's one-party political system, which can appoint and reshuffle local leaders based on economic targets. The report urges Western democracies like the U.S. and Europe not to mimic this model or make China an "awkward benchmark," but instead to foster more contestable economies by backing challengers. It cites China's gains in electric vehicles, solar, and batteries as stemming from fierce local rivalry and political centralisation, not a central master plan.

Key Points: Report: West Should Not Copy China's Industrial Model

  • China's model is decentralized authoritarianism
  • Thrives on regional and firm rivalry
  • Central government acts as referee, not engineer
  • Western democracies cannot replicate its political system
  • Success in EVs, solar due to fierce local competition
2 min read

West should not follow China's 'state-enabled pressure cooker' industrial model: Report

A report warns Western democracies against emulating China's "state-enabled pressure cooker" industrial system, tied to its one-party political structure.

"Industrial policy that shelters incumbents will disappoint; industrial policy that backs challengers and subjects them to real competition has a chance. - The Globe and Mail report"

New Delhi, March 30

China's industrial rise is due to institutionalised competition among provinces, cities and firms, with the central government acting as a referee and disciplinarian rather than as an engineer, a new report has said.

The report from The Globe and Mail called China's industrial policy "authoritarianism", adding that it "behaves less like central planning than a state-enabled pressure cooker."

Such a system thrived by enabling rivalry across firms and provinces, with the centre steering, rewarding and occasionally reining in excess, it added.

Special economic zones (SEZs) such as Shenzhen served as fenced experiments where officials tried these competitive experiments and successful models were scaled nationally while failures were contained, it said.

China runs a promotion race with provincial and city leaders rising or stalling on measurable outcomes such as investment, growth and jobs.

The report cited political economist Xu Chenggang as saying that the model is "regionally decentralised authoritarianism".

It urged the Western democracies such as the United States, Canada or Europe not to emulate China's model, and criticised the West's recently found appreciation for making China its "awkward benchmark".

It argued that democratic countries cannot easily replicate China's model which "is inseparable from a one-party cadre system that can appoint and reshuffle local leaders, tying careers to targets."

Western governments should not mimic China's tool kit or retreat into techno-nationalist fortresses, but to make their own economies more contestable, the report said, calling on democracies to widen entry and rivalry and not try to shelter incumbent industry leaders.

"Industrial policy that shelters incumbents will disappoint; industrial policy that backs challengers and subjects them to real competition has a chance," the report added.

It reminded that China's gains in EVs, solar and batteries owe less to a master plan than to political centralisation combined with rivalry across provinces and cities.

"In EVs, local governments bid for plants and add inducements; competition has become so fierce that Beijing frets about "irrational" price wars," the report said, noting that the same pattern appeared in solar industry and in AI.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The part about SEZs like Shenzhen is fascinating. We have our SEZs too, but the competition between our states isn't as ruthlessly tied to career promotions for IAS officers. Maybe a bit more healthy competition between Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu etc. could be good? 🤔 But not at the cost of democratic values.
R
Rohit P
Completely agree the West shouldn't copy this. And neither should we. China's model sacrifices too much for GDP numbers. Where is the freedom? Where is the voice of the common worker? Our growth has to be inclusive and respect individual rights. Jai Hind.
S
Sarah B
Interesting read from an Indian perspective. The report is right that democracies can't replicate the cadre system. But the core idea—fostering real competition instead of protecting existing big companies—is universal. Hope policymakers everywhere are listening.
V
Vikram M
"Backing challengers, not sheltering incumbents." This is the key line for me. In India, we often see policies that protect the old business houses. We need to empower new startups and MSMEs to truly compete. That's how we'll build aatmanirbhar Bharat, not by copying China's authoritarian playbook.
K
Karthik V
With respect, the report seems to downplay the sheer scale of human cost and lack of transparency in China's model. It's efficient on paper, but at what price? Our system is slower, but it has checks and balances. Let's not romanticise the "pressure cooker". It can explode.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50