SC Refuses Haldwani Eviction Stay, Orders PMAY Housing for 27,000

The Supreme Court has refused to stay the eviction of over 27,000 occupants from railway land in Haldwani. However, it directed Uttarakhand authorities to facilitate their rehabilitation by enabling applications under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana (PMAY). The court ordered the State Legal Services Authority to organize on-site rehabilitation camps starting March 18 to determine eligibility. A status report on eligible families must be submitted, with the court hoping the exercise concludes by March 31.

Key Points: SC on Haldwani Eviction: No Stay, PMAY Housing Ordered

  • Court refuses to stay eviction
  • Directs state to facilitate PMAY applications
  • Orders rehabilitation camps from March 18
  • Aims to complete process by March 31
3 min read

SC refuses to stay Haldwani eviction drive, directs Uttarakhand to facilitate housing under PMAY to occupants

Supreme Court directs Uttarakhand to rehabilitate 27,000 Haldwani occupants under PMAY, refusing to stay eviction but facilitating housing applications.

"We are not calling them 'encroachers', we have called them 'occupants'. - Supreme Court Bench"

New Delhi, February 24

The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Uttarakhand authorities to facilitate the rehabilitation of over 27,000 occupants residing near the Haldwani Railway Station by enabling them to apply for housing under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana.

The occupants are alleged to have encroached upon railway land, and eviction proceedings are underway.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi refused to stay the eviction but acknowledged that thousands of families are likely to be uprooted. The Court, therefore, directed the State to verify their eligibility under PMAY and submit a detailed status report before the next hearing.

Clarifying its stance, the Bench orally observed, "We are not calling them 'encroachers', we have called them 'occupants'". When they are being rehabilitated, they can't be called encroachers." The Court underscored that determining eligibility under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana was "highly desirable" to mitigate the impact of displacement.

In its order, the apex court directed the Collector and revenue authorities of Nainital and Haldwani districts to supply PMAY application forms to affected families to facilitate their enrolment under the scheme. It further instructed the Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority (SLSA) to organise rehabilitation camps at the site beginning March 18. The Member Secretary of the SLSA has been directed to remain present at the location after the commencement of the camp.

The Bench also asked the district administration to extend full cooperation to the Legal Services Authority to ensure smooth implementation of the scheme-related process. The Court expressed hope that the exercise would be completed by March 31 and noted that multiple camps could be organised if necessary. It permitted the SLSA to involve counsellors, social activists, and conduct door-to-door outreach campaigns to maximise awareness and participation.

The Collector or any designated authority has been tasked with determining family-wise eligibility and submitting a status report to the Court, specifying how many families qualify for benefits under the housing scheme. The Court said it would consider alternative solutions for those found ineligible at the next hearing after reviewing the report.

"The SLSA may also avail the services of counsellors, social activists, etc., and may hold a door-to-door campaign to ensure maximum outreach and awareness. The Collector or any other prescribed authority shall determine family-wise eligibility of the occupants and submit a status report to this Court indicating how many families are eligible to take the benefit of the scheme", the Court noted in its order.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the rehabilitation effort is commendable, it sets a worrying precedent. Railway land is crucial for infrastructure. What about the thousands who have been waiting for PMAY homes legally for years? Their wait gets longer because of those who occupied land illegally. The process needs to be fair for everyone.
P
Priyanka N
The Court's choice of words is significant - "occupants" not "encroachers". It shows empathy. But the real test is on the ground. Will the camps be accessible? Will the paperwork be simplified for these families? The involvement of SLSA is a good step. Fingers crossed for a just outcome.
A
Aman W
Finally some sense! You can't just bulldoze homes where people have lived for decades. The railway and state authorities also failed in their duty by letting this happen. Rehabilitation first, then reclaim the land. That's how a civilized society works. Good order by SC.
M
Michael C
The timeline seems very tight - application, verification, and report by March 31st? That's a massive administrative task for 27,000 families. Hope they have the manpower. The door-to-door campaign is essential, as many may not be literate or aware of such schemes.
K
Kavya N
This is a classic Indian solution - finding a middle path. The law is clear on encroachment, but reality is complex with lives and livelihoods. PMAY is a great scheme, but its success here depends on transparent eligibility checks. No favoritism, please! The status report will tell the real story.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50