US Dismisses Iran Peace Talk Speculations as Troops Deploy to Middle East

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labeled reports of potential US-Iran peace talks in Pakistan as mere speculation, stating nothing is official until announced by the administration. She strongly defended Vice President JD Vance's consistent and instrumental role in national security, specifically citing his work on Gaza ceasefire negotiations. The briefing occurred alongside news that the US is deploying approximately 2,500 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East. Leavitt deferred questions on specific incidents and troop movements to the Pentagon and the President.

Key Points: US Calls Iran-Pakistan Peace Talks 'Speculation' | Troop Deployment

  • White House dismisses Iran-Pakistan peace talk reports
  • US Vice President JD Vance affirmed as key to security team
  • US deploying 2,500 troops from 82nd Airborne Division
  • Iran reportedly prefers talks with VP Vance over other US officials
3 min read

Reports of peace talks in Pakistan are 'speculations': WH Press Secy

White House dismisses reports of Iran peace talks in Pakistan as speculation, reaffirms VP Vance's role, as US orders 2,500 paratroopers to the Middle East.

"I've seen that speculation. Nothing is official until it is announced by this White House. - Karoline Leavitt"

Washington DC, March 26

US White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said that the reports of possible peace talks with Iran to be held in Pakistan are 'speculation'.

Leavitt, while briefing the media, said that nothing is to be considered official unless it is announced by the White House.

"I've seen that speculation. Nothing is official until it is announced by this White House. We aren't going to get ahead of ourselves," she said.

When asked what has changed now that US Vice President JD Vance has become an active participant in the Iran war, Leavitt said that he had always been showing an active involvement.

"Nothing has changed. The Vice President has always been a key member of the national security team and the President's right-hand man. He was instrumental in the 12-day war negotiations and the ceasefire in Gaza. Any reporting suggesting otherwise is false," she said.

Iranian representatives on Wednesday told the Trump administration that they do not want to re-enter negotiations with US special envoy Steve Witkoff and US President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and would prefer to engage with US Vice President JD Vance, CNN reported, citing sources.

On being asked about a "very big present" the Iranians gave the US President, if it was that oil tanker carrying two million barrels that made it through the Strait of Hormuz, Leavitt said, "I will let the President speak on that at the appropriate time."

Upon being asked about reports indicating Iraq's government is planning to protest an attack on a military clinic that killed seven soldiers. And if the US was responsible, Leavitt said, "I'll have to check with the Pentagon on that and get back to you."

On being asked about the fact that Speaker Johnson described the conflict as "wrapping up" but the 82nd Airborne Division is currently deploying, and if the White House see this as winding down or changing shape, Leavitt said that the US is meeting its goals expeditiously.

"As I said, we are meeting our goals expeditiously. The President likes to maintain options, and it is the Pentagon's job to provide those options. For specific troop movements, I'd refer you to them," she said.

Meanwhile, the US has ordered the deployment of approximately 2,500 US soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, a Department of Defence official told Al Jazeera.

According to the official, the forces scheduled for deployment include commanders and logistical support elements from the division's 1st Combat Brigade.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting that Iran prefers to talk to VP Vance. Shows internal dynamics. But deploying 2500 more troops while talking about peace? 🤔 Mixed signals. India has to navigate these complexities carefully, especially with our Chabahar port interests and energy needs.
R
Rohit P
The Press Secretary's "I'll have to check" and "I'll let the President speak" answers are a masterclass in dodging questions! 😄 But seriously, the situation is tense. As an Indian, my main concern is the safety of our diaspora in the Gulf and the impact on oil prices.
S
Sarah B
With respect, the article highlights a lack of clear communication from the WH. Saying goals are being met "expeditiously" while deploying a major airborne division doesn't add up for the public. Clarity is needed, not just for Americans but for allies like India who are affected by every ripple.
V
Vikram M
Pakistan as a venue for talks is ironic, given their own challenges. Hope any peace process is genuine and not just for show. Stability in the region is crucial for India's growth and connectivity projects. Jai Hind.
K
Karthik V
The mention of the "very big present" and the oil tanker is the real story hiding in plain sight. Strait of Hormuz is the world's choke point. Any disruption there sends shockwaves directly to Indian markets and petrol pumps. Our government must have strong contingency plans.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50