Centre Rejects Separate UT Ministry, Says Existing Systems Sufficient

The Ministry of Home Affairs has clarified to the Lok Sabha that the government is not considering creating a separate ministry or department for Union Territory affairs. Minister of State Nityanand Rai stated there is also no plan for a dedicated Parliamentary Inspection Committee or a special policy framework for UTs like Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. The government emphasized that existing institutional mechanisms, including inter-ministerial consultations, are adequate for effective governance. Rai highlighted that oversight is already provided by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs.

Key Points: No Separate UT Ministry or Policy Framework: MHA

  • No separate UT ministry planned
  • No parliamentary inspection committee for UTs
  • No special policy for Daman & Diu
  • Existing governance mechanisms deemed sufficient
3 min read

No proposal for separate UT Ministry or special policy framework: MHA to Lok Sabha

MHA tells Lok Sabha no proposal for separate UT ministry, inspection committee, or special policy framework, citing existing mechanisms.

"no such proposal for constituting a dedicated ministry... is under consideration of the government - Nityanand Rai"

New Delhi, March 24

The Ministry of Home Affairs on Tuesday clarified that the Central government is not considering any proposal to create a separate ministry, parliamentary inspection committee, or special policy framework exclusively for Union Territories.

The statement was made in the Lok Sabha by Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai in response to a query raised by Independent MP Patel Umeshbhai Babubhai.

In his written reply, Rai stated that the government does not find the need for a dedicated "Ministry or Department of Union Territory Affairs" for managing UTs, nor is there any plan to establish a "Parliamentary Inspection Committee on Union Territories" to monitor their administration.

He also ruled out the possibility of introducing a special policy framework tailored for regions such as Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, despite their unique geographic and administrative requirements.

The minister emphasised that the existing institutional mechanisms are sufficient to ensure effective governance in Union Territories. These include regular inter-ministerial consultations and coordination among departments, which help in smooth policy formulation and implementation of developmental programmes.

"Existing institutional mechanisms, including regular inter-ministerial consultations and coordination, ensure smooth policy formulation and effective implementation of developmental schemes and programmes in the Union Territories, and that no such proposal for constituting a dedicated ministry, Parliamentary Inspection Committee and Special Policy Framework for Union Territories is under consideration of the government," the MoS informed the Lok Sabha.

As per the MHA, these systems have proven adequate in addressing administrative and developmental needs without requiring additional bureaucratic structures.

Rai further highlighted the role of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs, which already performs oversight, advisory, and review functions related to the administration of Union Territories. This committee regularly examines issues concerning governance, security, and development, and provides recommendations to improve administrative efficiency.

Providing a constitutional context, the minister noted that Union Territories are governed under Articles 239 to 241 of Part VIII of the Constitution of India. These provisions empower the Centre to directly administer UTs through appointed administrators or lieutenant governors, while also allowing for legislative assemblies in select territories such as Delhi and Puducherry.

The government's response indicates a preference for strengthening existing systems rather than introducing new institutional arrangements.

The response came when asked by the concerned MP whether the government is considering to constitute a dedicated "Ministry or Department of Union Territory Affairs" for the effective management of UTs; or proposes to constitute a specific "Parliamentary Inspection Committee on Union Territories" at the parliamentary level to monitor administrative functions and ensure accountability; or proposes to develop a special policy framework for regions like Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu (DNH and DD), taking into account their unique geographical and democratic requirements.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
I respectfully disagree. Places like Dadra and Nagar Haveli have very specific needs. A one-size-fits-all approach from Delhi might not work. A special policy framework could have addressed local issues better. Hope the existing mechanisms are truly responsive.
A
Aman W
Good move. We already have Lt. Governors and the Home Ministry overseeing things. Creating a separate ministry would just mean more officials, more cars, more expenses... all from taxpayer money. Simplify, don't complicate!
S
Sarah B
Interesting read. The constitutional provisions seem clear. But the MP asked a valid question about accountability. The Parliamentary Standing Committee must ensure it actively reviews UT issues and doesn't just exist on paper.
V
Vikram M
As someone from a UT, I feel our voice gets lost sometimes. Delhi and Puducherry have assemblies, but what about others? The "inter-ministerial consultations" need to actually involve local stakeholders, not just babus in North Block.
K
Karthik V
The government's logic is sound. Strengthen what exists. Every time a new department is created, coordination becomes a nightmare. Let's hope the current system delivers development effectively to all UTs. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50