Rajya Sabha Passes Bill Making Amaravati Andhra's Sole Capital; YSRCP Walks Out

The Rajya Sabha has passed the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026, legally cementing Amaravati as the state's sole and permanent capital. The YSR Congress Party opposed the bill, staging a walkout and its MP Golla Babu Rao criticising it as a "drama" that fails to deliver justice to local farmers. Congress MP Mallu Ravi supported the bill but urged the central government to also fulfill development promises made to the neighbouring state of Telangana. The bill's passage follows its approval in the Lok Sabha and a resolution by the Andhra Pradesh state assembly.

Key Points: Amaravati Made Permanent Capital of Andhra Pradesh as Bill Passed

  • Bill declares Amaravati sole capital
  • Passed by both Houses of Parliament
  • YSRCP MPs stage protest walkout
  • Opposition calls for justice to farmers
  • Congress urges focus on Telangana development
4 min read

Rajya Sabha passes AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026; YRSCP stages walkout

Rajya Sabha passes bill declaring Amaravati as Andhra's sole capital. YSRCP stages walkout, calling it a "drama," while Congress seeks Telangana promises.

"This Reorganization Act, adding Amaravati, is a drama. - Golla Babu Rao"

New Delhi, April 2

The Rajya Sabha on Thursday passed the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill, 2026, seeking to recognise Amaravati as the sole and permanent capital of Andhra Pradesh.

Once the bill becomes a law, Amaravati will be the sole and permanent capital of Andhra Pradesh with retrospective effect from June 2, 2024.

With the passage of the bill in the Rajya Sabha, following its approval in the Lok Sabha a day earlier, the Andhra Pradesh state expressed gratitude to the nation and its representatives for affirming Amaravati as its capital.

However, opposing the bill during the debate in Rajya Sabha, YSR Congress Party MPs staged a walkout

Speaking with ANI, Golla Babu Rao, YSRCP MP called the bill "a drama" and questioned the rationale behind the enactment of the bill. Underlining the possibility of constitutional amendments, he said that the capital should be changed only if justice is being served to its people.

"This Reorganization Act, adding Amaravati, is a drama. Dramatical. Just because a resolution was passed recently in the Andhra Pradesh Assembly and a bill or act was brought here, it doesn't make it permanent. Even at times, many constitutional amendments occur. Similarly, even after some time, if no one likes it, they can also change this act. There is always an opportunity to change this act anytime. At the same time, what I am asking is, let's keep Amaravati as Amaravati. But justice is not being served to the farmers and the people there. Only if justice is done to those farmers, women, and the poor, will this have true meaning. Otherwise, this act has no meaning or substance," he added.

Criticising Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, he accused him of harming the farmers and poor people of the capital region and allegedly benefitting the rich to earn commission. He further claimed that the bill will result in a bad future for the Chief Minister.

"This results in a bad future for Chandrababu Naidu, not now. They may feel very happy about bringing this bill and act, but the people of Andhra Pradesh know what is justice and what is to be done in the coming years. They will definitely do justice, which everyone will come to know," he added.

Further, Congress MP Mallu Ravi urged the BJP Ministers from Telangana to also support bills and policies related to development of the state and not just the Reorganisation bill. He said that he extended his request to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to implement the "promises made to the state."

"I also participated in the discussion of the bill. I told that we are supporting Amaravati as a capital because it is passed by the assembly and also the cabinet of Andhra Pradesh. But at the same time, through the speaker, I requested the honorable Prime Minister to also implement the promises given to Telangana. Particularly an IIT and then naming one of the irrigation projects, the Palamuru-Rangareddy project, as a national project. And then a steel factory, many other things which were promised by the then government during delimitation must be taken up by the present government. And I also requested the BJP ministers from Telangana to take up all these things instead of just supporting the Amaravati bill. They also have to support the development of Telangana," he said.

He reflected on the development done by the CM Revanth Reddy government in Telangana, including "free bus travel for all women, 200 units of free electricity, 500-rupee gas cylinders, 450,000 Indiramma house, about 105 integrated residential schools and 100 Telangana public schools."

He further said that "Telangana came into existence because of Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party" and that the ruling NDA "got Telangana by force."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I support having one capital, I hope the government genuinely addresses the concerns of the farmers in the Amaravati region. Justice for them is crucial, as the YSRCP MP pointed out. Development shouldn't come at the cost of people's livelihoods.
R
Rohit P
The walkout by YSRCP shows pure political drama. They had years to do something about it when they were in power. Now they are just opposing for the sake of opposition. The state needs to move forward, not get stuck in these games.
M
Mallu Ravi
Good point by Congress MP Mallu Ravi. The focus shouldn't just be on Andhra. Telangana's promised development projects like the IIT and the national project status for Palamuru-Rangareddy are still pending. The Centre must fulfill all promises made during bifurcation.
A
Ananya R
This is a welcome step. A permanent capital will boost infrastructure and job creation in the region. Hope this ends the long-standing confusion and helps AP attract more businesses. Jai Andhra Pradesh!
D
David E
Interesting to see the regional dynamics at play. The MP from Telangana shifting the discussion to his state's unmet demands shows how complex Indian federalism is. Every state is fighting for its share of resources and recognition.
K
Karthik V

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50