US-Iran Nuclear Talks Collapse After 21-Hour Marathon Session in Islamabad

US Vice President JD Vance announced that intensive negotiations with Iran in Islamabad have failed to produce an agreement after more than 21 hours of talks. Vance stated that US negotiators clearly outlined their position and red lines, but Tehran declined to accept the terms, which center on a long-term commitment against seeking nuclear weapons. The Vice President described the US approach as flexible and conducted in good faith under direct instructions from the President, with whom he was in constant contact. The breakdown marks a significant setback for efforts to revive diplomacy over Iran's contentious nuclear programme.

Key Points: US-Iran Talks Fail, No Deal Reached, Says VP Vance

  • 21-hour talks end without deal
  • Iran rejected US "final" terms
  • Core US goal is blocking nuclear weapons
  • Vance coordinated closely with President
  • Setback for diplomatic engagement
3 min read

No deal in US-Iran talks, says JD Vance

US Vice President JD Vance announces negotiations with Iran have broken down after 21 hours, with Tehran rejecting Washington's "final" nuclear terms.

"We have not reached an agreement. - J D Vance"

Washington, April 12

US Vice President J D Vance said negotiations with Iran failed to produce an agreement after more than 20 hours of talks in Islamabad, warning that Tehran's refusal to accept Washington's terms was "bad news for Iran much more than it's bad news for the United States of America."

"We have been at it now for 21 hours, and we've had a number of substantive discussions with the Iranians. That's the good news. The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement," Vance told reporters at a press conference in the early hours of Sunday morning .

The Vice President said US negotiators had clearly outlined their position but Tehran declined to accept the terms.

"We've made very clear what our red lines are, what things we're willing to accommodate them on, and what things we're not willing to accommodate them on, and we've made that as clear as we possibly could, and they have chosen not to accept our terms," he said .

Vance emphasised that the core US objective remained preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons capability.

"The simple fact is that we need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon," he said .

He added that Washington was seeking long-term assurances from Tehran, not temporary commitments.

"Do we see a fundamental commitment of will for the Iranians not to develop a nuclear weapon, not just now, not just two years from now, but for the long term. We haven't seen that yet. We hope that we will," Vance said .

Despite the breakdown, the Vice President described the US approach as flexible and conducted in good faith under instructions from the President.

"I think that we were quite flexible. We were quite accommodating. The President told us, You need to come here in good faith and make your best effort to get a deal. We did that, and unfortunately, we weren't able to make making headway," he said .

Vance also underlined the extensive coordination with the US leadership during the negotiations.

"We were talking to the president consistently. I don't know how many times we talked to him, a half dozen times, a dozen times over the past 21 hours," he said, adding that officials remained in contact with the wider national security team throughout the talks .

He confirmed that Washington has put forward what it considers its final proposal.

"We leave here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding that is Our final and best offer. We'll see," Vance said .

The failed talks mark a setback in efforts to revive diplomatic engagement over Iran's nuclear programme, which has long been a point of contention between Washington and Tehran. Previous negotiations have stalled over verification measures, sanctions relief and the scope of Iran's enrichment activities.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
21 hours of talks and no deal? Sounds like both sides came in with rigid positions. While non-proliferation is crucial, the US approach sometimes feels like "my way or the highway." This impacts oil prices and our economy too. Hoping for diplomatic patience.
A
Aditya G
From an Indian perspective, we've always advocated for dialogue and peaceful resolution. The Chabahar Port development shows our engagement with Iran is separate and based on our national interest. The world doesn't need another nuclear-armed state, that's for sure.
S
Sarah B
Vance saying it's "bad news for Iran much more than it's bad news for the US" is quite a bold statement. It puts the onus entirely on Tehran. The verification measures are always the sticking point. Hope they get back to the table soon.
K
Karthik V
The US wants "long-term assurances" but Iran likely remembers the last deal was scrapped by a subsequent administration. Where's the trust? India has to navigate this carefully - our relationship with both countries is important. A delicate balancing act.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, the US narrative of being "quite flexible" needs scrutiny. If the terms were non-negotiable red lines from the start, that's not flexibility. A genuine negotiation requires give and take. This setback is bad news for global security, period.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50