US-Iran Talks Collapse in Islamabad as Vance Declares "No Deal Reached"

US Vice President JD Vance announced that marathon negotiations with Iran in Islamabad have ended without an agreement. He stated the US presented clear red lines and a flexible position, but Iran chose not to accept the terms. The talks, which lasted 21 hours and covered issues including Tehran's nuclear program, concluded with the US labeling its proposal as a final offer. Vance communicated that the lack of a deal is worse news for Iran than for the United States.

Key Points: US-Iran Talks Fail, Vance Says "Bad News for Iran"

  • 21-hour talks end in stalemate
  • US cites Iran's rejection of terms
  • Focus on nuclear weapons commitment
  • US calls its offer "final and best"
  • Discussions covered Strait of Hormuz
2 min read

"No deal reached", says US VP JD Vance as Islamabad talks reach stalemate

US VP JD Vance announces stalemate in Islamabad talks with Iran, citing Tehran's refusal to accept US terms on nuclear commitments.

"That is bad news for Iran, much more than it is bad news for the United States of America. - JD Vance"

Islamabad, April 12

After hours of negotiations in Pakistan between US and Iran, talks have reached a stalemate on Sunday as US Vice President JD Vance said that no agreement has been reached in talks with Iran. He said that while they would be returning to the US, the development is a "bad news for Iran" than it is for the United States.

Addressing reporters from Islamabad, Vance said that during the negotiations that took place for 21 hours, several substantial discussions were held however, no conclusions were reached.

"We've had a number of substance agreements with the Iranians- that is the good news. The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement. That is bad news for Iran, much more than it is bad news for the United States of America."

"We go back to the United States having not come to an agreement", Vance said.

He underlined that while the US made it clear what its red lines were and the issues it was willing to accommodate, Iran, however, "chose not to accept our terms".

Responding to the media, Vance reiterated that Washington had sought an affirmative commitment from Tehran not to seek nuclear weapons and the tools to achieve it.

He added, "We just could not get to a situation where the Iranians were willing to accept opur terms."

He said that while the US had been very "flexible and accommodating", the talks could not make a headway.

"We leave here with a very simple proposal- a method of understanding that is our final and best offer. We'll see if the Iranians accept it."

During the presser, Vance noted that he spoke with President Donald Trump "consistently", along with several other top US officials throughout the negotiations, which included Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent, and Adm. Brad Cooper, Commander of US Central Command.

"We were constantly in communication with the team because we were negotiating in good faith," Vance said.

Meanwhile, CNN reported that the marathon talks covered issues including the Strait of Hormuz and Tehran's nuclear program, as per Iran's foreign ministry.

The key announcement by the US Vice-President comes after marathon discussions took place in Islamabad.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting that the talks were held in Islamabad. Pakistan always tries to position itself as a mediator, but their own record isn't exactly clean. Hope our diplomats in Delhi are taking notes.
A
Arjun K
Vance saying it's "bad news for Iran" sounds like a classic negotiation tactic. But the real bad news is for countries like India who rely on stable oil prices and safe shipping lanes. Any trouble in the Strait of Hormuz hits our economy hard.
P
Priya S
21 hours of talks and nothing? Seems like both sides came in with rigid positions. While the US focus is on nukes, for us in India, the bigger concern is terrorism sponsored from the region. That should be on the table too.
M
Michael C
With respect, I think the US approach is too confrontational. Calling it your "final and best offer" publicly leaves no room for diplomacy. A quieter, more persistent channel might have worked better. This stalemate helps no one.
K
Kavya N
India has to walk a very fine line here. We have good relations with both the US and Iran. Our energy security depends on Iran, but our strategic future is tied to the US. Tough spot for MEA. Hope they're preparing for all scenarios.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50