Delhi HC Quashes NMC's "Manifestly Unreasonable" Ban on Medical Student Migration

The Delhi High Court has struck down a National Medical Commission (NMC) regulation that imposed a complete ban on the migration of medical students between institutions. The court ruled the blanket prohibition was "manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary," failing to account for exceptional cases like those involving persons with disabilities. The judgment came on a petition by a visually impaired student whose eye condition worsened due to the climate in Barmer, Rajasthan, where he was studying. The court directed the NMC to reconsider the student's transfer request and formulate a new policy allowing migration in deserving cases with necessary safeguards.

Key Points: Delhi HC Strikes Down NMC Rule Barring Medical Student Migration

  • HC quashes NMC's blanket migration ban
  • Rules it "manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary"
  • Permits transfer for visually impaired student
  • Directs NMC to frame new policy for exceptional cases
3 min read

'Manifestly unreasonable': Delhi HC quashes NMC regulation barring migration, permits transfer for visually impaired student

Delhi High Court quashes NMC regulation banning medical student migration as "arbitrary," permits transfer for visually impaired student.

"total prohibition on transfer or migration of a student... cannot be said to be reasonable - Delhi High Court Bench"

New Delhi, Feb 5

The Delhi High Court has struck down a provision of the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, which imposed a blanket ban on migration of medical students from one institution to another, holding it to be "manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary" and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

A division bench of Chief Justice (CJ) Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia ruled that a complete prohibition on migration fails to account for exceptional and deserving cases, particularly involving persons with disabilities, and cannot be justified on grounds of administrative convenience or apprehensions of misuse.

The CJ Upadhyaya-led bench was hearing a petition filed by a medical student with 40 per cent visual impairment, who sought migration to a medical college in Delhi due to the deterioration of his eye condition, caused by the harsh climatic conditions in Rajasthan's Barmer.

Earlier, the National Medical Commission (NMC) had rejected his request for migration from the Government Medical College, Barmer, citing Regulation 18 of the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023.

Setting aside the impugned regulation, the Delhi High Court observed that "total prohibition on transfer or migration of a student, need of which may occur in various situations, including the one which has arisen in this case, cannot be said to be reasonable".

"In our opinion, such prohibition is manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary," the bench held, adding that the regulation "does not permit even a most deserving student, a person with disability, like the petitioner, to seek transfer, keeping in view the statutory mandate" under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

It took note of the petitioner's submission that due to the denial of his rightful participation in initial counselling rounds under the PwD category, he was compelled to take admission in Barmer during the stray vacancy round, where limited choices were available.

The harsh climatic conditions there, the Delhi High Court noted, had aggravated his eye condition, requiring treatment at AIIMS, New Delhi.

It also rejected the NMC's argument that migration provisions were removed due to their potential misuse, holding that "mere possibility of abuse cannot be used to deny legitimate rights".

Referring to the statutory obligations under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the Delhi High Court said that provisions such as "reasonable accommodation" cannot remain "a decorative and admirable piece of literature kept in a bookshelf".

"These are legislative mandates to be followed by all public authorities, which will encompass the Commission as well," the bench said.

Declaring Regulation 18 of the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, as ultra vires and invalid, the Delhi High Court also quashed the NMC's December 30, 2024, order rejecting the petitioner's migration request. It directed the NMC to take a fresh decision on the petitioner's request for transfer to University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, within three weeks, and further directed the Commission to formulate an appropriate policy permitting migration in exceptional and deserving cases, subject to necessary safeguards.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
Finally, some common sense from the judiciary. The Barmer climate is extremely harsh, and for someone with a visual impairment, it's a genuine health hazard. The court's line about laws not being "decorative literature" is so powerful. Hope the NMC acts swiftly.
R
Rohit P
While I support the judgment for this student, I worry about misuse. We all know how medical college admissions work in India - there's a lot of pressure and manipulation. The NMC must frame the new policy with very strict, verifiable criteria to prevent corruption in the name of "exceptional cases".
S
Sarah B
This is a victory for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The initial denial of his rightful counselling spot under the PwD category is where the injustice began. The system failed him at the first step, and then the migration ban added to it. Glad the court set things right.
V
Vikram M
Heartening to see the judiciary step in. Administrative convenience cannot override fundamental rights. This student showed immense perseverance to fight this legal battle while managing his health and studies. Salute to him and his family. 🙏
K
Karthik V
The NMC's approach was lazy. Instead of creating a robust system to handle genuine cases, they just banned everything. This judgment forces them to do their job properly. Now they need to design a fair migration policy within three weeks – a tight deadline but necessary.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50