Ex-Envoy: Iran is a Global Threat, Not Just Israel's Problem

Former Israeli Ambassador to India Daniel Carmon asserts that the confrontation with Iran cannot be seen as a simple bilateral issue, but is instead a regional and global problem due to Iran's sponsorship of terrorism and development of ballistic missiles and nuclear capabilities. He highlights that Iranian actions have caused damage in neighboring countries across the Gulf, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, indicating the conflict's wide reach. Carmon suggests Iran may be seeking to revive Sunni-Shia tensions and that the regime, beyond just Supreme Leader Khamenei, must be changed to remove its threat. He expressed optimism that the current disruptive situation is not permanent and that the region will see better days following a peaceful change.

Key Points: Iran a Global Problem, Not Just for Israel: Ex-Envoy

  • Iran's threat extends beyond Israel
  • Actions affect Gulf states like UAE, Saudi Arabia
  • Regime change needed to end threat
  • Conflict disrupts global supply chains
  • Leadership loss doesn't end the regime
3 min read

"Iran is not an Israeli problem, it's a global, regional problem": Former Israeli Ambassador Carmon

Former Israeli Ambassador Daniel Carmon says Iran's missile, nuclear, and terror sponsorship is a regional & global issue, not a bilateral dispute.

"Iran is not an Israeli problem. Iran is a global and a regional problem. - Daniel Carmon"

Tel Aviv, March 2

Former Israeli Ambassador to India, Daniel Carmon, has said that the confrontation with Iran "cannot be viewed" as a bilateral dispute between Tel Aviv and Tehran, asserting that the issue is regional and global in nature, with implications stretching across West Asia and beyond.

He said that the conflict is not limited to Israel and Iran, and one must look at and be aware of.

Speaking to ANI on Sunday on the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, Carmon said, "Iran is not an Israeli problem. Iran is a global and a regional problem... You cannot detach the confrontation with Iran's sponsoring terrorism and developing ballistic missiles and nuclear capabilities, and detach it only to a bilateral conflict between Iran and Israel."

He further claimed that Iran's actions have affected several countries in the region.

"The Iranians are attacking the neighbouring countries that are part of our region. We have seen damage in Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and even Jordan," he said, highlighting that the fallout of the hostilities is not confined to Israel alone.

Explaining why Iran may be targeting Middle Eastern countries, Carmon suggested that there might be an indirect will to bring turmoil to the region, and maybe to revive the ancient Sunni-Shia confrontation.

"There might be an indirect will to bring turmoil to our region and maybe to revive the ancient Sunni-Shia confrontation. Maybe this is a way to pressure the US to end the attack because regional neighbours are being attacked. It is so obvious that this is not limited to Israel and Iran. It is something we must look at and be aware of," he said.

On the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Carmon said the leadership question extends beyond a single individual.

"It's not only Khamenei. It is a list of 3 to 5 other leaders of the defence and political establishment in this terrorist regime. They nominated Ahmad Vahidi. Vahidi is a terrorist who has led terrorist attacks throughout the past 30 years... He is the guy who is going to lead the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) ... It reinforces the fact that this regime must be changed, taking away its capabilities to pose a threat to the region, including Israel," he said.

Carmon also highlighted concerns over disruptions to the global supply chain amid the conflict but expressed optimism that the situation would not be permanent.

"The world cannot stay indifferent to those developments, but those developments are not a permanent situation... When this is eliminated as a regime and changed by a peaceful one, I'm sure that West Asia or the Middle East will have much better days," he said.

On India's role in the escalating tensions, the former envoy said, "I am sure that India does not have a role."

The remarks come amid heightened tensions in West Asia following joint missile strikes titled Operation Roaring Lion/Operation Epic Fury by Israel and the United States on Iran on February 28.

Explosions were reported in Tehran and other major cities, with US President Donald Trump and Iranian state media confirming that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in the strikes, alongside his daughter, grandchild, daughter-in-law, and son-in-law.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the regional concern, framing it as a "global problem" that requires regime change is a dangerous escalation. The world has seen where such rhetoric leads. Diplomacy and de-escalation should be the priority, not more conflict.
P
Priya S
The mention of Sunni-Shia tensions is worrying. India has citizens from both communities living in harmony. External conflicts should not be allowed to import these divisions here. Our foreign policy must be balanced and protect our domestic peace.
V
Vikram M
It's interesting he says India has no role. With our historical ties to Iran and growing strategic partnership with Israel and the US, we are uniquely positioned. Maybe quiet diplomacy is our role? We have millions of citizens working in the Gulf who need stability.
R
Rohit P
The supply chain disruption is the real worry for us common people. If shipping costs go up because of this, prices of everything from electronics to groceries will shoot up. Hope our government is preparing for this. 🙏
K
Karthik V
A former ambassador calling for regime change is not diplomacy, it's advocating for war. The solution cannot be more violence. The region has suffered enough. The global community, including India, should push for dialogue.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50