NewKerala.com

Sufi Council Slams USCIRF Report, Defends India's Religious Freedom

Syed Naseruddin Chishty, Chairman of the All India Sufi Sajjadanashin Council, has strongly rejected a USCIRF report on religious freedom in India. He stated that comparing India's situation to countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh is misleading and affirmed the constitutional protection of religious freedom in India. The report, which called for sanctions against the RSS and RAW, was also slammed by 275 Indian signatories including retired judges, bureaucrats, and armed forces officers. They labeled the report as "disturbing," "off the mark," and motivated by "anti-Bharat vested interests."

Key Points: India's Religious Freedom Defended in USCIRF Report Rejection

  • USCIRF report condemned
  • India's religious freedom defended
  • Pakistan, Bangladesh called unstable
  • 275 Indian veterans reject report
  • Sanctions on RSS, RAW called for
3 min read

"Comparing India to unstable countries like Pakistan or Bangladesh misleading": All India Sufi Sajjadanashin Council Chairman slams USCIRF report

Ajmer's Sufi Council Chairman condemns USCIRF report, calls India-Pakistan comparison misleading. 275 Indian veterans also reject the findings.

"Comparing India to unstable countries like Pakistan or Bangladesh is misleading. - Syed Naseruddin Chishty"

Ajmer, March 22

Syed Naseruddin Chishty, Chairman of All India Sufi Sajjadanashin Council, on Sunday condemned the United States Commission for International Religious Freedom report over the international religious freedom report, saying that comparing India to unstable countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh is misleading.

Speaking to ANI, he said, "I reject any commission's report. As the spiritual successor of Ajmer Dargah and Chairman of All India Sufis, I affirm that India grants full religious freedom, protected by the Constitution. We have all witnessed the nationwide celebrations on the occasion of Eid ul-Fitr yesterday. So, we refute such claims stating India does not give religious freedom."

"In case of any religious dispute, the administration intervenes on the spot to carry out an investigation and punish the accused individual. There is no discrimination here," he added.

He further emphasised that countries Pakistan and Bangladesh are unstable, underlining that Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir has recently threatened Shia Muslims for protesting in favour of Iran.

"We have seen the situation in Bangladesh recently, and the world has seen how Pakistan favours terrorism. Recently, Asim Munir threatened the Shia Muslim community and said, 'if you want to support Iran, go there'. Whereas people in India have openly supported Iran through protests, did the Indian government stop anyone? America should see this. Indians are free to express themselves however they deem fit. Comparing India to unstable countries like Pakistan or Bangladesh is misleading. In India, citizens freely express their views," he said.

The US-based Commission alleged that India's "political system facilitates a climate of discrimination toward religious minority communities" despite offering some constitutional protections for freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). It called for sanctions against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Earlier on Saturday, a total of 275 signatories, including 25 retired judges, 119 retired bureaucrats and 131 armed forces officers, also slammed the United States Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) report.

The joint statement by former judges, civil servants and armed forces veterans disregarded the USCIRF report as "disturbing and completely off the mark," questioning its credibility and balance. It condemned the USCIRF for "portraying Indian state institutions and socio-cultural organisations like RSS in a negative light.

The statement said that the USCIRF's recommendation to freeze assets, restricted movement of Bharatiya citizens and place restrictions on those associated with RSS is "highly motivated, and displays intellectual bankruptcy and deranged conclusions." The signatories asked the US government to conduct a background check of the contributors to this report, accusing USCIRF of promoting the agenda of "anti-Bharat vested interests.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
While I agree that comparing India to Pakistan is misleading, we must also introspect. There have been incidents that cause concern. A balanced view is important – we have a great constitutional framework, but its implementation on the ground can sometimes be questioned.
R
Rohit P
Finally, someone with a spiritual voice is calling out this nonsense! The US commission has no moral standing to lecture us. 275 signatories including retired judges have also rejected it. This is a motivated report by people who don't understand India's diversity and unity.
A
Aman W
The point about protests is key. In India, you can protest for Iran or Palestine. In our neighborhood, you get threatened by the army chief. That itself shows the difference. Our democracy is vibrant and loud, and that's our strength.
K
Kavya N
As a Hindu, I have Muslim friends and colleagues. We celebrate each other's festivals, attend weddings, and share food. This report paints a picture that doesn't match my daily reality in Mumbai. Foreign agencies often see India through a political lens, not a human one.
D
David E
Interesting perspective from the Sufi Council Chairman. It's crucial to hear from religious leaders within the country. The collective statement from former judges and officers also carries significant weight. It suggests the report may lack nuance about the on-ground situation.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50