COAI Slams D2M Broadcast Tests as Non-Transparent, Incomplete

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has raised serious concerns over the recent technical tests for Direct-to-Mobile broadcasting, calling them non-inclusive and inconsistent with the government's consultative framework. The association states the telecom industry was surprised by a published test report created without the participation of key stakeholders like service providers and device makers. COAI criticized the tests for having a limited scope, excluding critical factors like EMF compliance and real-world usage scenarios, and for not being technology-neutral. It has urged the government to re-conduct a comprehensive, transparent evaluation with all stakeholders involved to safeguard network integrity and India's digital growth.

Key Points: COAI Flags Lack of Transparency in D2M Broadcasting Tests

  • Tests lacked telecom operator participation
  • Terms of Reference not shared beforehand
  • Critical aspects like EMF compliance excluded
  • Not technology-neutral, focused on single standard
  • COAI urges re-evaluation with proper consultation
3 min read

COAI flags lack of transparency in Direct-to-Mobile broadcasting tests

Telecom body COAI criticizes Direct-to-Mobile broadcast tests as non-inclusive, incomplete, and lacking transparency, urging a re-evaluation.

"Any national-level technical evaluation... must be transparent, inclusive and technology-neutral - Lt. Gen. Dr. S.P. Kochhar"

New Delhi, January 5

The Cellular Operators Association of India has raised strong concerns over the manner in which recent technical tests on Direct-to-Mobile broadcasting were conducted, stating that the exercise was non-inclusive, incomplete and inconsistent with the consultative framework envisaged by the government.

According to COAI, D2M broadcasting carries significant implications for spectrum management, telecom networks, device ecosystems and consumer safety. Given its potential impact, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB), during a stakeholder meeting in September 2025, had directed that a comprehensive technical evaluation be undertaken with clearly defined Terms of Reference (ToR), participation of all stakeholders and inclusion of all relevant technology options.

Lt. Gen. Dr. S.P. Kochhar, Director General, COAI said, "Direct-to-Mobile broadcasting has far-reaching implications for spectrum, networks, devices and consumer safety. Any national-level technical evaluation of such a technology must be transparent, inclusive and technology-neutral, with active participation of all affected stakeholders. COAI firmly believes that policy decisions of this magnitude must be grounded in comprehensive, technical assessments to safeguard network integrity, efficient spectrum use and long-term digital growth".

COAI said the telecom industry was taken by surprise when a technical test report was published without the participation of telecom service providers or device ecosystem partners.

The association also pointed out that the ToR for the tests were not shared with stakeholders prior to the evaluation, raising questions over transparency and procedural fairness.

COAI further noted that the scope of the tests appeared limited, focusing primarily on parameters such as interference and device heating, while excluding several critical aspects. These include electromagnetic field (EMF) compliance, device certification requirements, regulatory and licensing implications, real-world usage scenarios, and the readiness of the device and chipset ecosystem.

The association also highlighted that the test methodology did not adequately reflect India-specific spectrum allocations and deployment conditions, potentially limiting the relevance of the findings to actual operational telecom networks in the country.

Another major concern raised by COAI was the absence of technology neutrality in the evaluation. The tests reportedly focused on a single technology standard, without assessing other globally relevant alternatives such as cellular-based broadcast technologies. COAI warned that selective evaluation could pre-empt outcomes and result in unintended consequences for India's digital and telecom ecosystem.

Emphasising the impact of D2M on spectrum bands earmarked for current and future IMT/5G services, the telecom industry reiterated the need for active involvement of telecom operators and regulators to address coexistence challenges, interference risks and long-term spectrum planning considerations.

COAI has urged the government to re-conduct the technical evaluation with a stakeholder-finalised ToR, ensure technology-neutral assessment of all relevant options, and involve telecom operators, device manufacturers, chipset vendors, regulators and accredited laboratories throughout the process. The association has also called for a structured public consultation under the aegis of DoT and TRAI, and the development of standards and performance benchmarks through an open consultative process led by the Telecom Engineering Centre (TEC).

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As a consumer, I'm worried about device heating and EMF compliance. If they didn't test these properly, how can we trust this D2M tech is safe? Safety should be the first priority, not last. Government needs to listen to the experts.
R
Rohit P
Typical bureaucratic approach. Announce first, think later. Excluding telecom operators from a test about telecom networks? That's like making a samosa without potatoes! 🫢 Hope they redo the tests properly with all stakeholders.
S
Sarah B
While I understand COAI's concerns about process, I hope this doesn't delay innovation. Direct-to-mobile broadcasting could be great for emergency alerts and rural education. The intent seems good, but the execution needs fixing. Let's get it right.
V
Vikram M
The point about India-specific conditions is crucial. What works in a lab or another country may not work on our crowded airwaves. We need 'Make in India' testing standards, not just borrowed protocols. Jai Hind!
K
Karthik V
With respect, the government should have known better. After the whole 5G spectrum auction and rollout learnings, we should have a robust framework for testing new tech. This feels like a step back. Hope TRAI steps in to ensure a fair process.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50