Ex-Envoy Slams US Venezuela Moves as "Colonialism," Warns of Instability

Former Indian Ambassador Y.K. Sinha has strongly criticized recent U.S. statements and actions regarding Venezuela, labeling them a troubling return to the era of colonialism. He questioned the international legality of forcibly removing a president and putting them on trial in a foreign country. Sinha noted that while Venezuela's political situation is contested, foreign control is unlikely to be accepted by its people, and the international community has largely reacted with caution. He emphasized India's measured, principled stance that balances strategic interests and called for dialogue.

Key Points: Former Ambassador Criticizes US Actions in Venezuela

  • US actions violate sovereignty
  • Evokes colonialism and gunboat diplomacy
  • India's response is measured
  • Regional instability risk
  • Underlying oil interests
3 min read

Back to the days of colonialism and gunboat diplomacy: Former Ambassador to Venezuela Y.K. Sinha

Ex-Indian envoy Y.K. Sinha condemns US stance on Venezuela, calling it a return to gunboat diplomacy and a threat to sovereignty and regional stability.

"Will any self-respecting country... accept being run by a foreign power? - Y.K. Sinha"

New Delhi, January 5

Former Indian Ambassador to Venezuela Y.K. Sinha has sharply questioned recent U.S. actions and statements on Venezuela, calling them troubling for international law, regional stability, and global norms of sovereignty. Speaking to, Sinha described U.S. President Donald Trump's claim that Washington would "run" Venezuela until a power transition takes place as "quite astounding," especially given the legacy of past interventions.

Sinha expressed particular concern over what he described as the forcible removal and rendition of Venezuela's president. "Is it an acceptable norm that another country... abducts the president, and takes him to stand trial in a foreign court?" he asked. "As per international law, is this acceptable? This is a question that everyone should ask."

While acknowledging that Venezuela's political situation remains deeply contested, Sinha stressed that foreign control is unlikely to find acceptance among ordinary citizens. "Will any self-respecting country, self-respecting people, irrespective of what their political affiliations are, accept being run by a foreign power?" he said, adding that such moves evoke memories of "the days of colonialism and gunboat diplomacy."

On the ground, Sinha noted, the situation remains fluid. He pointed out that Venezuela's vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, has reportedly assumed the presidency in line with constitutional provisions and is mandated to hold elections within 30 days. "She doesn't speak about the U.S. running the country," he observed, cautioning that "till the facts come out in the open, it's very difficult to understand what exactly is happening."

Commenting on global reactions, Sinha said most of the international community has responded cautiously. "The international community has by and large not supported the action," he noted, adding that India's response has been "very measured." New Delhi, he said, must balance its principles with its strategic interests. "We have to be mindful of our own bilateral relations with the United States and other countries," Sinha explained, while welcoming India's call for dialogue and concern for the safety of Indians in Venezuela.

Sinha also warned of broader regional consequences. "When you take arbitrary action like this, it opens a Pandora's box," he said, arguing that U.S. intervention risks deepening instability across Latin America, a region with a long memory of external interference.

On energy, Sinha downplayed the immediate impact on India, noting that Indian oil imports from Venezuela are already minimal due to sanctions and declining production. Still, he suggested resources remain a key underlying factor. "President Trump even referred to it as 'our oil'," Sinha recalled, adding that any revival of Venezuela's oil sector would take years.

Ultimately, Sinha emphasized that India would continue to act in its own national interest. "India is not a small country that can be browbeaten," he said, underscoring New Delhi's commitment to strategic autonomy amid intensifying great-power rivalries.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's a very complex situation. While the US action seems heavy-handed, we also can't ignore the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela. But abducting a president? That sets a dangerous precedent. India's measured response is wise. We have to think of our diaspora's safety first. 🙏
R
Rohit P
"Our oil" – President Trump's words say it all. This is about resources, not democracy. Reminds me of what colonial powers used to say. Glad a senior diplomat is speaking up. India needs to build alliances with other Global South nations to counter such unilateralism.
S
Sarah B
Respectfully, I think the Ambassador's critique, while valid in principle, overlooks the complete failure of the Maduro regime. Sometimes extreme situations require extreme measures to prevent greater human suffering. The international community's caution has often meant inaction.
V
Vikram M
Strong words from Sinha ji! "Gunboat diplomacy" is the perfect term. If the world accepts this, what's stopping powerful countries from doing the same elsewhere? India's strategic autonomy is our biggest strength. We cannot be seen as endorsing regime change by force.
K
Kavya N
The point about the Vice President assuming power and mandating elections is crucial. The solution must come from within Venezuela, following their constitution. External imposition never works in the long run. Hope dialogue prevails. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50