US Senator Blocks Diego Garcia Transfer, Citing China Concerns

US Senator John Kennedy has introduced the Diego Garcia Treaty Oversight Act to prevent any modification of the 1966 US-UK agreement without Senate approval. The move directly challenges a UK proposal to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, which include the Diego Garcia base, to Mauritius. Kennedy framed his opposition by warning the base could fall under the influence of China, calling Mauritius "a pal of Xi Jinping's." The strategic military installation is a critical logistical hub for US operations across the Indian Ocean, Middle East, and Indo-Pacific.

Key Points: US Senator Moves to Block Diego Garcia Sovereignty Transfer

  • Bill blocks Chagos transfer without Senate consent
  • Targets UK plan to cede islands to Mauritius
  • Cites strategic and China concerns
  • Requires presidential report to Congress
3 min read

US Senator moves to block Diego Garcia

Senator John Kennedy introduces bill requiring Senate approval for any changes to the US-UK treaty governing the strategic Diego Garcia military base.

"That's why I take issue with the United Kingdom trying to give our joint military base on Diego Garcia to a pal of Xi Jinping's - Sen. John Kennedy"

Washington, March 14

A US senator has introduced legislation to block any transfer of sovereignty over the Chagos Islands - including the strategic Diego Garcia military base - unless the US Senate formally approves changes to the long-standing defence treaty between Washington and London.

Sen. John Kennedy, a Republican from Louisiana and a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, introduced the Diego Garcia Treaty Oversight Act, which would require the advice and consent of the Senate for any modification to the 1966 agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom concerning the British Indian Ocean Territory.

The move comes amid concerns in Washington over a proposal by the United Kingdom to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. The archipelago includes Diego Garcia, home to a key joint US-UK naval support facility.

"When two countries shake hands on a treaty, one of them can't start changing the terms without the other country agreeing to it. That's just common sense," Kennedy said.

"That's why I take issue with the United Kingdom trying to give our joint military base on Diego Garcia to a pal of Xi Jinping's-all without getting the US Senate's consent. My bill would make sure that our friends in the UK don't modify our treaty and hand this gift to China without giving the Senate a say," he added.

Under the legislation, any modification to the 1966 agreement would require Senate approval before it could take effect. The bill also prohibits federal agencies from using funds to alter the treaty unless the Senate has provided its consent.

In addition, the measure would require the President to submit a report to Congress before entering negotiations on any treaty modification. The report must detail the national security rationale for the proposed change, assess implications for US operational control of Diego Garcia, and evaluate risks posed by third-party sovereignty claims or foreign military presence.

Kennedy has repeatedly criticised the proposed transfer of the Chagos Islands.

The Louisiana senator has also engaged critics of the proposal in Britain and led a letter to the Trump administration encouraging Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to oppose the arrangement.

Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago, hosts a major joint US-UK military installation and serves as an important logistical and operational hub for American forces in the Indian Ocean region.

The base has long played a key role in US military operations across the Middle East, Africa and the Indo-Pacific. Its location allows the United States to support long-range naval and air operations and maintain strategic presence across a vast stretch of the Indian Ocean.

The dispute over the Chagos Islands has been a long-running issue in international diplomacy. Mauritius has long claimed sovereignty over the archipelago, which Britain separated from the territory before Mauritius gained independence in 1968.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The senator is right to be cautious. The Indian Ocean is not a playground for great power rivalry. Mauritius is a friend, but its growing economic ties with China are well-known. Stability at Diego Garcia is crucial for regional security. Hope all parties act responsibly. 🤞
A
Arjun K
Frankly, this shows the double standards of Western powers. The UK forcibly removed Chagossians decades ago to set up this base. Now they are debating sovereignty while the original inhabitants are still fighting for justice. The entire situation is a colonial hangover that needs a fair resolution, not just strategic posturing.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in the region, the strategic importance of Diego Garcia cannot be overstated. It's a linchpin for maritime security. While treaty formalities are important, the bigger picture is preventing any single nation from dominating the Indian Ocean sea lanes, which are vital for global trade, including India's.
V
Vikram M
Calling Mauritius "a pal of Xi Jinping's" is unnecessary and disrespectful. Mauritius is a sovereign nation with its own foreign policy. The focus should be on ensuring the base continues to serve as a stabilising force, not on inflammatory rhetoric. The US and UK should engage Port Louis constructively.
K
Karthik V
India has invested heavily in its own naval presence in the Indian Ocean. Regardless of who controls Diego Garcia, our priority must be to strengthen the Indian Navy and our partnerships with regional players like Mauritius and Sri Lanka. Atmanirbharta in defence is the ultimate answer. 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50