Better transparency, plugging leakages: Hindu member in MP's Waqf Board outlines priorities
Bhopal, July 7
Animesh Bhargave, one of the two Hindu members in the recently reconstituted Waqf Board committee of Madhya Pradesh, outlined his priorities while defending his appointment as an 'inclusive' move and one aimed at bringing more transparency in the board's functioning.
Speaking to IANS, Bhargave said that the ten-member Board's foremost priority was to increase the efficiency of Waqf board properties, prevent income leakages, and transfer benefits to the disadvantaged and marginalised classes within the minority community.
"The government's intention behind appointing us is to bring transparency. Many people have flagged underutilisation of Waqf properties and encroachment on land. Buildings and assets have been taken over, but proper rent is not being paid, so the board is not generating adequate income. We aim to improve these areas and stop leakages," he explained.
Responding to critics, he said that these properties have long been held by a noted few, and they fear that greater transparency will expose them and end their fiefdom.
Outlining his role as an 'expert and advisor', he said they will devise a strategy to prevent income leakage within the Board and focus on increasing revenue.
"The properties are being misused. The potential income they could generate is not being realised. I will try to contribute as an expert or advisor in this regard," he elaborated.
Notably, Bhargave, along with Manoj Malpani, is one of the two non-Muslim members of the newly constituted MP Waqf Board under the amended Waqf Law. Their appointment to the Board triggered full-blown political controversy and widespread debate.
As the questions surround his appointment to the Waqf Board, he said that the inclusion of Hindu members in the Waqf Board was in accordance with laws enacted by Parliament, and there is nothing immoral about it.
Notably, Madhya Pradesh is the first state in the country to reconstitute its Waqf Board under the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025. The new law provides for the inclusion of at least two non-Muslim members in State Waqf Boards, a major departure from the earlier Waqf Act, 1995, under which members were drawn exclusively from the Muslim community.
The restructured Board is expected to play a key role in streamlining Waqf-related affairs, preventing encroachments, and ensuring that these properties serve the intended socio-economic purposes, the government said earlier.
— IANS
Reader Comments
I'm a bit skeptical about this. Why does a Waqf Board, which manages Muslim community properties, need non-Muslim members? It feels like unnecessary interference. However, if it truly brings better management and benefits to the needy within the community, I'm open to giving it a chance. Time will tell.
Finally, some accountability! For decades, these Waqf properties have been mismanaged—encroachments, no proper rent collection, and the poor suffer. If a Hindu member can bring in professional expertise and transparency, why not? It's about governance, not religion. Good move, MP government.
I appreciate the focus on preventing income leakage and underutilisation. As an outsider looking in, it seems logical to have diverse perspectives on a board. But the controversy is understandable—it's a sensitive issue. I hope the new members are mindful of the community's sentiments and work collaboratively.
This is a classic case of 'sabka saath, sabka vikas'. If the properties are being misused by a few, then exposing them is good for everyone. The Muslim community's poor deserve the benefits, and if a Hindu member can help achieve that, I'm all for it. But the opposition's concerns about minority rights are valid—let's ensure no overreach.
Interesting development. The idea of including non-Muslim experts for better governance isn't inherently bad—it's done in many countries for various boards. But the way it's being pushed through the amended law seems politically charged. I hope the focus remains on socio-economic upliftment, not on creating a
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.