Congress MPs Tharoor & Tewari Defend India's West Asia Policy, Defying Party Line

Senior Congress MPs Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari have publicly defended the Indian government's diplomatic approach to the West Asia conflict, breaking from their party's critical stance. Tharoor justified India's cautious position as "responsible statecraft" rooted in Nehruvian non-alignment, while Tewari stated the conflict is "not India's war." Their endorsements challenge the criticism leveled by their own party, including by chairperson Sonia Gandhi. This marks another instance where the two veterans have supported the government's foreign policy, creating internal dissonance within the Congress.

Key Points: Congress MPs Tharoor, Tewari Back Centre's West Asia Policy

  • Congress veterans defy party criticism
  • Call India's stance "responsible statecraft"
  • Cite Nehru's non-alignment legacy
  • Emphasize protecting national interest
  • Highlight India's "multi-alignment" approach
3 min read

Amid Congress criticism, two of its veteran MPs justify Centre's West Asia policy

Senior Congress MPs Shashi Tharoor & Manish Tewari justify India's diplomatic stance on Iran-Israel tensions, calling it strategic autonomy, not moral surrender.

"It is not our war. We've always been rather marginal players in the greater Middle East. - Manish Tewari"

New Delhi, March 19

Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari, both Members of Parliament from the Congress party, have publicly defended India's foreign policy amid the conflict in West Asia involving Iran, Israel, and the US. The two veterans have expressed support for India's skilful management of the situation, emphasising the importance of safeguarding its own interests in the region.

Shashi Tharoor, in an op-ed, justified India's 'silence' as a responsible statecraft and not moral surrender as claimed by many, while Manish Tewari said it was "not India's war" and justified India's stand on watching the developments unfold from a distance.

Tharoor, who also heads the Standing Committee on External Affairs, referred to Jawaharlal Nehru's policy of non-alignment to deflate the claims (made by Cong-led opposition) that India was taking sides by tilting towards the powerful US-Israel axis.

"India's diplomacy has always been about balancing principle with pragmatism. Jawaharlal Nehru's policy of non-alignment was not a refusal to take moral positions, but a recognition that India's sovereignty and survival depended on avoiding entanglement in Cold War hostilities," Tharoor wrote in the article.

Stating out the realities of an increasingly multipolar world in today's era, he wrote, "India practises 'multi-alignment' -- engaging with diverse powers, sometimes in tension with one another, while keeping our national interest paramount."

He admitted that the war on Iran is unjustifiable under international law but opined that India's 'silence' is not an endorsement of that war, but it's rather a recognition that our national interest requires prudence, not posturing.

"For a government to recognise geopolitical realities and weigh consequences for India's economy and strategic position before taking a public stand is not 'moral surrender'. It is responsible statecraft," he further said.

Manish Tewari, speaking at an event recently, also backed the Central government on maintaining a safe distance from the hostilities, given the fact that India has always remained a marginal player in the region.

"It's important to understand that there is not one war which is happening in West Asia. There are multiple wars which are taking place.... What really is happening between Israel-United States and Iran, taking a side, is not about just the Middle East dynamics on its own," Tewari said.

"Well, it's not our war. We've always been rather marginal players in the greater Middle East..." he added.

Further speaking about India's strategic autonomy, he said, "If we are circumspect, I think probably we are doing the right thing, because that is really what strategic autonomy is about, the ability to protect your interests and navigate."

The Modi government's alleged silence on the West Asia crisis and delay in condoling the killing of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei have invited widespread criticism from various quarters, particularly the opposition. Congress Parliament party (CPP) chairman Sonia Gandhi also penned an open letter lamenting the government's dilly-dallying in handling the situation in West Asia.

Now, the endorsement of India's stance on the Gulf crisis by two veteran Congressmen calls into question and 'punctures' the apprehensions and concerns raised by the grand old party.

Notably, the two Congressmen had also defended the Modi government's diplomatic outreach after the Operation Sindoor, a move that put them at odds with their own party's leadership.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Interesting to see Congress leaders defending the government's stance. Shows there is bipartisan support for a pragmatic foreign policy. Multi-alignment is the need of the hour. We need oil and we have diaspora in the Gulf - we must tread carefully.
A
Aman W
While I agree with the principle of strategic autonomy, complete silence can sometimes be misconstrued as weakness. India is a major power now. We should have a voice that reflects our values, while also protecting our interests. A balanced statement was needed.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in Delhi and following geopolitics, Tharoor's explanation makes perfect sense. Nehru's non-alignment was for a different era. Today's 'multi-alignment' is more complex but necessary. The government is handling a very delicate situation.
K
Karthik V
This exposes the hypocrisy within the Congress party. First they criticise, then their own senior MPs support the policy. Which is it? The party seems to be opposing just for the sake of opposition. National interest should be above party politics, always.
M
Meera T
Prudence over posturing. That's the key takeaway. We are not a superpower who can dictate terms. We have to manage relations with Iran, Israel, and the US simultaneously. It's a tightrope walk, and quiet diplomacy is often more effective than loud statements.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50