Sanjeev Sanyal Warns: 'Freebies' and Pensions Create Liabilities for Next Gen

Sanjeev Sanyal distinguishes essential welfare "safety nets" from politically-driven "freebies," arguing the latter are poorly targeted and fiscally irresponsible. He advocates for "assisted trickle-down" policies that create pathways out of poverty rather than universal subsidies. A major concern is the revival of old pension schemes, which he warns will burden a shrinking future workforce with unsustainable liabilities. Drawing parallels with Europe's ageing crisis, he cautions that ignoring these fiscal realities could lead to similar strains in India within decades.

Key Points: Sanyal on Freebies & Pensions: A Fiscal Warning for India

  • Welfare vs. Freebies
  • Assisted Trickle-Down
  • Pension Fiscal Time Bomb
  • Demographic Shift Risks
  • Targeted Subsidies Needed
3 min read

"We are creating liabilities for next generation": Sanjeev Sanyal on 'freebies culture' and pension schemes

PMEAC's Sanjeev Sanyal warns that untargeted freebies and old pension schemes risk overwhelming India's future finances as demographics shift.

"You are effectively creating liabilities for the next generation. - Sanjeev Sanyal"

New Delhi, December 27

Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister member, Sanjeev Sanyal, drew a sharp distinction between welfare "safety nets" and politically driven "freebies," warning that poorly targeted subsidies and generous pension promises could create unsustainable fiscal burdens for future generations.

In an interview with ANI, Sanyal, while speaking on economic policy and social welfare, said a certain level of safety net is essential in any risk-taking society. "In a risk-taking culture, failure is inevitable. Whether it's a startup or even setting up a small kirana shop, risk exists at every level. Some people will fall off at the edges, and society must provide safety nets for them," he said.

"I want to clarify that I'm also in favour of passing of some benefits to the poorer sections to give them the ladder to climb up. I have no problem with that," he said.

However, he cautioned against assuming that economic growth alone will lift everyone. "Trickle-down does happen, but it doesn't reach everyone. What we need is assisted trickle-down, creating pathways upward and helping those who can't climb on their own," Sanyal noted.

At the same time, he expressed discomfort with universal, non-targeted freebies, citing examples such as free bus travel for women.

"This is not targeted. A poor man is as deserving of support on public transport as a woman. These are clear cases of freebies rather than well-designed welfare," he said, arguing that subsidies should be linked to economic need rather than broad identity categories.

Sanyal also raised serious concerns about the reintroduction of old-style generous pension schemes for civil servants, warning that such commitments could overwhelm public finances as demographics shift. "You are effectively creating liabilities for the next generation," he said, pointing out that India's working-age population will begin to shrink in about 25 years.

"You have to be very careful about doing this because you are effectively creating liabilities for the next generation because most pensions have pay-as-you-go schemes, but if you are creating systems that will be paid out of current revenues, then be very clear that as our demographic turns at the end of this cycle, maybe after 25 years, the population or working age will shrink. And you will be loading that shrinking working population with the pensions of the previous generation, and they will not be able to pay it," he explained.

Drawing comparisons with Europe, Sanyal highlighted the strain caused by ageing populations.

"In several European countries, retirement ages are being pushed toward 70 or even 75. France today has more people receiving pensions than people working," he said, warning that similar dynamics could emerge in India if fiscal realities are ignored.

He cautioned young civil servants against expecting long-term pension security under old-style pension schemes. "Over your working life, you will be taxed for 35 years. But when you reach the front of the queue, there may be no money left to pay you. The arithmetic simply doesn't work," Sanyal said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I agree with the need for targeted welfare, but calling women's free bus travel a 'freebie' is a bit harsh. For many working women from lower-middle-class families, it's a genuine relief and enables them to work. The policy needs nuance, not outright dismissal.
R
Rohit P
The pension point is crucial. My father is a retired government employee and his pension is secure, but I'm in the private sector with only PF. If OPS comes back, who will pay for it when we have fewer young people? It's a ticking time bomb 💣. We need sustainable NPS.
S
Sarah B
As an outsider looking at India's growth story, this is a very mature conversation. Many developed nations are struggling with exactly these pension liabilities. India has a demographic advantage now, but must plan for the future. "Assisted trickle-down" is a smart concept.
K
Karthik V
True. But the problem is political will. Which party will dare to stop these freebies before elections? It's easy for an economist to say, but in a democracy, immediate voter satisfaction often wins over long-term fiscal health. A tough balance.
M
Meera T
He's right about the safety net. My brother took a risk to start a small business and failed during COVID. Schemes like PM-SVANidhi were a lifeline. That's welfare. But giving free power to everyone, rich or poor, is just wasteful spending of taxpayer money.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50