Trump shifts away from claims of having 'stopped' war between India, Pakistan

IANS June 19, 2025 300 views

Trump walked back his earlier claims of single-handedly stopping the India-Pakistan conflict, instead praising PM Modi and Pakistan's Army Chief for their roles. The US president's shifting statements came after Modi explicitly rejected any third-party mediation during their phone conversation. Trump's lunch meeting with General Munir underscored the Pakistani military's continued dominance in foreign policy matters. The episode revealed ongoing tensions between Washington's diplomatic approach and India's firm stance against external intervention in regional disputes.

"Two smart people, two very smart people, decided not to keep going with that war that could have been a nuclear one" – Donald Trump
Trump shifts away from claims of having 'stopped' war between India, Pakistan
Washington, June 19: In a matter of hours, US President Donald Trump shifted from his claims of having "stopped" the war between India and Pakistan, and gave credit to "two very smart people, (who) decided not to keep going with that war that could have been a nuclear" one without claiming a mediatory role for himself.

Key Points

1

Trump initially claimed credit for stopping India-Pakistan conflict

2

Later praised Modi and Munir for averting nuclear escalation

3

India denied US mediation in talks with Pakistan

4

Meeting with Munir highlights Pakistan military's diplomatic influence

After a lunch with visiting Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir on Wednesday, Trump said he wanted to thank him and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for ending last month's conflict.

"I'm so happy there was a deal that two smart people, plus people on their staff too" worked out an end to the war, Trump said without repeating the claims he had made earlier of "stopping the war" and crediting the two sides for the truce.

"Two smart people, two very smart people, decided not to keep going with that war that could have been a nuclear" one, he said.

"Well, those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided that" to not continue with the fighting.

That was around 3 p.m., while speaking to reporters at the Oval Office, where Trump was meeting with members of the Juventus Football Club team.

Only about five hours earlier, he had asserted to reporters, "I stopped the war between Pakistan and India."

While watching with reporters a 30-metre-tall flagpole being erected on the White House lawn around 10 a.m., he said repeatedly, "I got it stopped."

And he lamented that he did not get credit for his role in ending the war.

India has maintained that there was no US mediation as Trump has claimed.

In a phone conversation with Trump on Tuesday night.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi bluntly told the US President so, pointing out that Pakistan had directly initiated the talks to end the fighting, according to an External Affairs Ministry readout of the call.

"Due to India's firm action, Pakistan was compelled to request a cessation of military operations," PM Modi told Trump, according to the Ministry.

He also told him that India would never agree to any third party mediation in the matter with Pakistan, the readout said.

After his lunch with Munir on Wednesday, Trump said, "Reason I had him here, I wanted to thank him for not going into the war, just ending the war" between India and Pakistan.

"This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, PM Modi from the India side, and others."

In a ham-handed attempt at being evenhanded, Trump added, "And I want to thank, as you know, Prime Minister Narendra Modi," with whom he said he had spoken a little while ago.

"And we're working a trade deal with India," he said.

Trump said that with Munir, he discussed Iran about which he knew "better than most".

Pakistan's Embassy in Washington represents Iran's interests in the US which does not have diplomatic relations with it (Switzerland handles US diplomatic relations in Tehran).

Trump has served an opaque ultimatum to Iran to "surrender" and left the modalities and consequences open-ended.

Trump tried to play down the differences between the US, which strongly supports Israel, and Pakistan, a vehement supporter of Iran that has condemned Israel's attacks on Tehran's nuclear facilities.

"They (Pakistan) are not happy about anything," Trump said.

"It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know about Iran, but they probably, maybe they know Iran better."

In having Munir over, Trump recognises the supremacy of the military in Pakistan, which keeps a show of democracy with a civilian government beholden to the Army.

During Operation Sindoor, Washington initially talked to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif but switched to dealing with Munir when it realised where the power lay.

The invitation to Munir underscores that reality, and unlike the Democratic Party administrations, Trump has no problems in dealing with the military and non-democratic leaders.

Reader Comments

Here are 5 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
R
Rajiv K.
Typical Trump behavior - first taking credit, then backtracking when facts emerge. India has always maintained there was no US mediation. Our armed forces' strong response made Pakistan come to the table. Period. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
Why is Trump hosting Pakistan's Army Chief when we all know they sponsor terrorism? This sends wrong signals. India should be cautious about US intentions - they keep changing statements like the weather! 😒
A
Amit S.
Modi ji handled this perfectly. Clear message that India won't accept third-party mediation on Kashmir or any bilateral issue with Pakistan. Our foreign policy is strong under this government 💪
S
Sunita R.
The way Trump keeps flip-flopping shows why we can't take American statements at face value. First he claims credit, then changes tune after speaking to PM Modi. We need to maintain strategic autonomy in foreign policy.
V
Vikram J.
While I support our government's stance, we must be careful not to alienate the US completely. They're still an important partner for countering China. But yes, no third party should interfere in India-Pak matters - that's non-negotiable.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: