Key Points

Punjab's AAP government has vehemently opposed the One Nation One Election proposal, calling it unconstitutional. Finance Minister Cheema warned it would erode state autonomy during JPC consultations. Meanwhile, BJP leaders like Kalraj Mishra argue simultaneous polls save costs, citing India's electoral history. The debate highlights tensions between federal principles and administrative efficiency.

Key Points: Punjab Minister Cheema Rejects One Nation One Election as Anti-Federal

  • Punjab govt calls ONOE unconstitutional
  • BJP cites Nehru-era precedent
  • JPC gathers state feedback
  • Debate pits federalism against cost savings
4 min read

We strongly oppose it, won't allow it to be passed: Punjab Minister Cheema on One Nation, One Election

AAP's Harpal Singh Cheema opposes ONOE citing threat to federalism, while BJP's Kalraj Mishra backs simultaneous polls for cost efficiency

"This move threatens the autonomy of states, and we strongly oppose it - Harpal Singh Cheema"

Chandigarh, June 14

Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Saturday strongly opposed the Centre's One Nation, One Election (ONOE) proposal, terming it a direct assault on the federal structure of the country and against the spirit of the Constitution framed by Dr BR Ambedkar.

Speaking to ANI after a meeting with the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) in Chandigarh, Cheema reiterated the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)-led Punjab government's firm stance against the initiative, arguing that it undermines state autonomy.

"The JPC and its Chairman visited Punjab today to seek the views of the state government and political parties on One Nation, One Election. We have clearly presented our viewpoint before the Committee--this agenda is harmful to the country. It aims to dismantle the federal structure of the nation and goes against the principles of our Constitution. This move threatens the autonomy of states, and we strongly oppose it. We will not allow it to be passed," Cheema said.

In contrast, State Convener for ONOE, SS Channy, supported the initiative, claiming that "people want One Nation, One Election to be implemented."

"I welcome the JPC for coming to Punjab to listen to the political parties. We went around the state, and people want One Nation, One Election to be implemented. This will save time and money," Channy said, highlighting the potential benefits of reduced election expenditure and administrative disruptions.

Meanwhile, endorsing the One Nation One Election (ONOE) initiative, senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former Rajasthan Governor Kalraj Mishra has said it will not only reduce election-related expenses but also speed up the country's development by opening new avenues.

Addressing an event at the Constitution Club in the national capital on Friday evening, Mishra said Lok Sabha and assembly polls were conducted simultaneously without any hiccups until 1967, since the first polls in independent India in 1952, as everyone was in support of simultaneous polls, be it the then ruling Congress or Communist parties.

"Everyone supported it, beyond political affiliations, be it then Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru or Communist leaders...," the former union minister said at the event, organised by Radheshyam Charitable Foundation, to raise awareness about One Nation, One Election.

He said the trend was "broken" due to many reasons.

"It was broken as some new states were formed, and their assembly elections were held... then ruling Congress dismissed the opposition ruled state governments by misusing Article 356; general elections were preponed in 1972... term of Lok Sabha was also increased by an year to 6 years during Emergency...," said Mishra said, who was the Governor of Rajasthan from 2019 to 2024.

Simultaneous polls across the country will significantly reduce poll expenditure and manpower. This is not about any political party, ONOE is "essential for the country's development," he stressed.

Mishra said it is fully "according to the Constitution" and said the opposition parties should be asked which schedule of the Constitution forbids the ONOE.

The senior leader recalled that even in 1983, the Election Commission felt the need to rethink on the simultaneous polls and said it was essential for the country. He said NITI Aayog in 2016, and other government commissions have also endorsed the ONOE.

The 129th Constitutional Amendment Bill for simultaneous national and assembly polls was tabled in the Lok Sabha in December last. It was later referred to the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The Modi government had formed a High-level Committee on simultaneous Elections, under the chairmanship of former President Ram Nath Kovind, who submitted an over 18,000-page report to President Droupadi Murmu in March last year.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
As someone from Punjab, I fully support Minister Cheema's stand. Federalism is the backbone of our democracy. Why fix something that isn't broken? States have different issues and timelines. This feels like Delhi trying to control everything. 👎
P
Priya M.
The cost argument makes sense - we spend thousands of crores on elections every year. But will this really work in practice? What if a state government falls mid-term? Either we'll have President's rule for years or frequent by-elections defeating the purpose.
A
Amit S.
Good initiative! Too much time and money wasted in election after election. Small states like ours (Uttarakhand) suffer the most with continuous election cycles. Development work stops for months due to model code of conduct. One election = more governance time.
N
Neha T.
Interesting how both sides quote Ambedkar ji to support their views. As a law student, I think we need more public debate on this. The Constitution gives states their powers for good reason. Maybe a middle path - cluster elections by region instead of complete synchronization?
S
Sanjay V.
Punjab's concerns are valid but let's not make this North vs South or Center vs States. We're one nation first. If implemented properly with safeguards for state rights, ONOE could reduce corruption and policy paralysis. But the devil is in the details - need proper framework.
K
Kavita R.
Elections are festivals of democracy! Why reduce their frequency? More elections mean more accountability. Also, regional parties will suffer as national issues will dominate. This favors big national parties with more resources. Not fair for diverse India! 🗳️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50