Key Points

India has made a strong push at the United Nations to classify terrorism sponsorship as a crime against humanity. BJP MP S. Phangnon Konyak emphasized that justice demands accountability for terrorist atrocities. While supporting the proposed convention, she stressed it must respect national sovereignty and diverse legal systems. The draft treaty, inspired by the Rome Statute, faces negotiations in 2028 amid concerns about ICC politicization.

Key Points: India Demands UN Declare Terrorism Sponsorship Crime Against Humanity

  • India pushes for explicit inclusion of terrorism in crimes against humanity definition
  • BJP MP stresses need for justice for terrorist atrocities
  • Convention must respect national sovereignty and legal diversity
  • Treaty should align with UN Charter and international law principles
  • Concerns raised about politicization of International Criminal Court
  • Draft treaty negotiations scheduled for 2028-2029 UN meetings
2 min read

Sponsoring terrorism must be declared crime against humanity: India 

India calls for terrorism sponsorship to be classified as crime against humanity at UN, emphasizing justice and accountability while respecting national sovereignty.

"Justice and accountability demand that such acts are not overlooked - S. Phangnon Konyak"

United Nations, Oct 14

India has called for declaring terrorism and sponsoring it crimes against humanity.

“We emphasise that any definition of crimes against humanity must explicitly capture the heinous crimes and atrocities perpetrated by terrorists and their sponsors”, BJP MP S. Phangnon Konyak told the General Assembly’s Legal Committee on Monday.

“Justice and accountability demand that such acts are not overlooked”, she said during the committee’s discussion on crimes against humanity.

While stressing that it was important for the proposed international convention to prevent and punish crimes against humanity to include terrorism, Konyak also expressed some reservations about some aspects of it.

She said that any treaty should consider “the diversity of legal systems and unequivocally respect national sovereignty”.

Nations have “the primary responsibility and obligation to ensure justice and accountability for the most egregious violations of human rights and mass atrocities committed either in their territory or by their nationals”, she said.

Any convention should also be “consistent with the Charter of the United Nations and the universally recognised principles of international law”, she said.

Without these it would cause “fragmentation and conflict with existing legal norms.”

The draft was created by the International Law Commission and the General Assembly last year called for international meetings in 2028 and 2029 to negotiate a treaty on crimes against humanity.

Konyak, who represents Nagaland in the Rajya Sabha, said that the draft is inspired by the Rome Statute that set up the International Criminal Court and pointed out that India and several countries, including permanent members of the Security Council have strong reservations and are not parties to it.

Moreover, she said many countries have raised serious concerns about the politicisation of the International Criminal Court.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I appreciate how our representative balanced the need for international cooperation while respecting national sovereignty. This is crucial for countries like India with our unique legal framework and democratic values.
M
Michael C
While I support the sentiment, I'm concerned about the implementation. The International Criminal Court has shown bias in the past. India's reservations about politicization are valid - we need a truly impartial system.
S
Sarah B
As someone who has lost family members in terrorist attacks, this initiative gives me hope. Terrorism destroys lives across borders, and those who enable it should face consequences. Justice for all victims! 🙏
R
Rohit P
Good to see India's voice being heard on global platforms. Our experience with cross-border terrorism makes us uniquely qualified to speak on this issue. Hope other nations support this proposal.
K
Kavya N
The timeline until 2028-2029 seems too long. Terrorism is an urgent threat that needs immediate attention. Why can't this be fast-tracked? Every day of delay costs innocent lives.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50