Former Army Chief Naravane Stresses Apolitical Military for Strong Democracy

Former Indian Army Chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane has stressed the importance of keeping the armed forces insulated from political narratives to strengthen democracy. He stated that the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force pride themselves on being apolitical institutions, which is a key strength for the country. While the organization remains apolitical, individual soldiers retain their democratic rights, including voting. Naravane's comments come amid controversy over his unpublished memoir, which was cited by Rahul Gandhi in Parliament to target the government over the 2020 China standoff.

Key Points: Naravane: Keep Armed Forces Away From Politics

  • Naravane emphasizes apolitical character of Indian armed forces
  • Armed forces are a pillar of democracy alongside judiciary and press
  • Individual soldiers retain democratic rights like voting
  • Naravane's unpublished memoir sparked political controversy in Parliament
3 min read

"Keep armed forces as far from politics as possible": Former Army Chief Naravane stresses apolitical character of military

Former Army Chief Gen Manoj Mukund Naravane says armed forces must stay apolitical to strengthen democracy, while individual soldiers retain voting rights.

"The armed forces should be kept as far away from politics as possible. - General Manoj Mukund Naravane"

New Delhi, April 25

Former Indian Army Chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane has emphasised the importance of keeping the armed forces and their leadership insulated from political narratives, stating that the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force have always maintained an apolitical institutional character.

Speaking to ANI on the role of the armed forces in a democracy, the former Army Chief said the armed forces should be kept as far away from politics as possible to make the country strong.

"The armed forces should be kept as far away from politics as possible. The Indian armed forces pride themselves on being a very apolitical Army, Navy, and Air Force. If you see what is happening in the country's periphery, it is a strength that we have never even sought to get involved in political matters, and that's what makes our country strong," he said.

Highlighting the institutional role of the military in a democratic system, he added that the armed forces remain one of the pillars supporting the country's governance structure alongside the judiciary and the press.

"That's what makes our democracy strong, that we are one of the pillars of governance, along with the judiciary and the press. This is a strong pillar on which the country is doing so well," Naravane said.

At the same time, he clarified that individual members of the armed forces retain their democratic rights as citizens.

"But that does not mean that we cannot have our own political affiliations, that we cannot cast our vote. You have to differentiate between the organisation and the individual. As an organisation, we are totally apolitical. But as individuals, we have full democratic rights to cast our vote," he added.

Meanwhile, in February, the former Army chief Naravane was surrounded by controversy for his unpublished memoir after the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, cited the book to target the Centre over the 2020 standoff against China.

On February 2, during the motion of thanks on the President's Address, Lok Sabha witnessed sharp verbal exchanges after Rahul Gandhi in the Lower House sought to quote a magazine article containing excerpts from General Naravane's unpublished memoir.

Gandhi's reply was interrupted by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who raised concerns that a Congress MP cannot quote from an unpublished book, which he said has not been authenticated. The ruling benches objected to Gandhi's attempt to cite excerpts from the book.

The row escalated to an extent where Opposition MPs brought a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, with allegedly not letting Rahul Gandhi speak in the House being one of the reasons.

The motion was dropped after a voice vote in the second phase of the Budget Session of the Parliament.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I completely agree. The apolitical nature of our military is what sets us apart from many other nations. But I also appreciate that he didn't deny individual soldiers their democratic rights. That balance is crucial. The real question is: will our politicians ever learn to stop trying to use the armed forces for their own agendas?
V
Vikram M
Saab ne sahi kaha! Our army, navy, and air force are the real guardians of democracy. They don't need to be dragged into political mudslinging. But this controversy over his memoir is concerning. If there are genuine questions about the 2020 standoff, they should be discussed in a proper forum, not twisted for political point-scoring.
D
David E
I've lived in several countries, and India's military discipline in staying apolitical is truly admirable. It's a key reason why our democracy has survived and thrived despite many challenges. General Naravane's clarity on this is refreshing. Let's hope this message reaches those who might want to blur the lines.
R
Rohit P
I agree with the sentiment, but let's not pretend the armed forces have never been politicized. The whole controversy over General Naravane's memoir shows how easily the military can be dragged into political crossfire. The defence minister's objection to quoting an unpublished book seems more about avoiding uncomfortable questions than protecting the army's apolitical character.
S
Sarah B
A much-needed reminder. The strength of India's democracy lies in its institutions, and the military must remain one of the strongest pillars. As a citizen, I

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50