Key Points

South Korea's rival parties clashed during PM nominee Kim Min-seok’s confirmation hearing, with the PPP questioning his financial and academic records. The DP defended Kim, comparing the scrutiny to past PPP-affiliated nominees. Kim addressed policy pledges, including a shorter workweek and retirement age adjustments. The DP, holding a parliamentary majority, is expected to approve his confirmation despite PPP objections.

Key Points: South Korean Parties Clash Over PM Nominee Kim Min-seok Hearing

  • PPP demands tax and immigration records from Kim Min-seok
  • DP compares scrutiny to past PPP-affiliated PM nominees
  • Kim defends workweek and retirement age pledges
  • DP holds majority to confirm nominee despite PPP objections
3 min read

South Korea: Rival parties clash during confirmation hearing for PM nominee

Rival parties clash as PPP demands evidence on PM nominee Kim Min-seok’s wealth and education, while DP defends his qualifications.

"The hearing cannot proceed like this – PPP Rep. Bae June-young"

Seoul, June 25

South Korean rival political parties clashed on Wednesday as they disagreed over the eligibility of Prime Minister nominee Kim Min-seok during the second and final day of his confirmation hearings.

The main opposition People Power Party demanded the nominee submit evidence to clarify allegations surrounding his wealth and family, while the ruling Democratic Party protested the PPP's baseless attacks were disrupting a thorough vetting of his abilities.

"The hearing cannot proceed like this," PPP Rep. Bae June-young, ranking member of the confirmation hearing committee, said, demanding that the nominee submit records of the tax and other payments he claimed to have made the previous day.

Bae also demanded immigration records and a report card proving that Kim did earn a master's degree at China's Tsinghua University.

"I will provide what I can and what is necessary," the nominee answered.

DP Rep. Chai Hyun-il shot back, however, by citing the cases of former prime ministers under PPP-affiliated administrations, such as Han Duck-soo, Hwang Kyo-ahn and Chung Hong-won, saying various documents went unsubmitted during their confirmation hearings.

"Was it an invasion of privacy then but vetting now?" he protested.

The prime minister is the only Cabinet position that requires parliamentary consent for appointment. Other minister nominees undergo the confirmation process, but consent is not necessary for their appointment by the president.

The PPP is unlikely to agree to adopting a report, which is a step in the confirmation process, as it has consistently questioned Kim's eligibility and demanded his withdrawal.

During the first day of hearings Tuesday, the PPP grilled the nominee over the source of his income amid large differences between his reported wealth and spending, as well as allegations surrounding his son's college admissions and his own studies at Tsinghua University, Yonhap news agency reported.

The DP defended the nominee while highlighting his professional aptitude to serve in the number 2 government role.

The motion for a prime minister's confirmation passes by majority approval, with a majority of lawmakers present.

The DP can single-handedly pass Kim's motion as it currently holds a parliamentary majority with 167 out of 298 seats.

Kim, a four-term lawmaker of the DP and a former top campaign aide to President Lee Jae Myung, shared his thoughts on some of Lee's campaign pledges, such as a 4.5-day workweek.

"The overall direction was proposed, and the execution plans have to be discussed additionally," he said. "Reducing the number of working days can be considered in line with global trends and human nature."

On the pledge to raise the retirement age, Kim said it is a matter requiring comprehensive discussions and social acceptance.

"If I become prime minister, I think it could be worth commissioning a full-scale study by a state-run think tank," he said.

The PPP has called for extending the hearings by a day to better vet the nominee, while the DP has maintained they should be completed on Wednesday before finalising the confirmation next week.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Interesting to see political drama in South Korea! Reminds me of our own Parliament sessions when opposition parties demand documents and proofs. Every democracy has similar challenges it seems. Hope they resolve it peacefully 🤞
P
Priya M.
The education verification part caught my eye - we've seen similar controversies in India about fake degrees. Transparency is must for public servants! South Korea setting good example by thorough checking.
A
Arjun S.
While political scrutiny is necessary, sometimes opposition parties cross limits just to stall governance. We've seen this in India too. Hope South Korea finds balance between accountability and progress.
N
Neha T.
The 4.5 day workweek idea sounds revolutionary! But as Indian working professional, I wonder if developing nations can afford such luxuries when we're still building infrastructure and economy. Thoughts?
V
Vikram J.
Interesting to note how South Korea's political system differs from ours. Their PM needs parliamentary approval while our PM is directly appointed. Each system has its pros and cons. More power to democracy! 🇮🇳🇰🇷
S
Sunita R.
The retirement age debate is relevant for India too. With increasing life expectancy, we need to rethink these policies. But must be done carefully considering youth employment. South Korea's approach of thorough study makes sense.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50