Key Points

Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol appeared before a special counsel over insurrection charges tied to his failed martial law declaration. He's also accused of obstructing justice by ordering security forces to block his arrest. Yoon's legal team condemned the probe as a political stunt, citing procedural violations. This marks his first questioning since his January arrest, making him the first sitting South Korean president to be detained.

Key Points: Ex-South Korea President Yoon Questioned Over Martial Law Bid

  • Yoon questioned over December martial law bid and obstruction charges
  • Accused of ordering security to block arrest and delete records
  • First ex-president questioned in prosecutors' office he once led
  • Legal team calls probe a "political show"
3 min read

South Korea: Ex-President Yoon questioned by special counsel over martial law bid

Ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol faces special counsel probe on insurrection charges linked to failed martial law declaration and obstruction allegations.

"(The special counsel team) must not unilaterally notify the suspect or publicly expose the suspect's appearance in a way that infringes on their rights. - Yoon's legal team"

Seoul, June 28

Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol appeared for questioning by a special counsel team on Saturday over insurrection charges related to his December 3 martial law declaration.

Yoon arrived at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office in southern Seoul at 9:56 a.m., two weeks after the special counsel probe was launched and just 85 days after his impeachment.

This marks the ousted President's first appearance before an investigative body in about 5 months, following his arrest and questioning by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) in January.

In addition to his insurrection charges in connection with the failed martial law bid, Yoon is accused of ordering the Presidential Security Service (PSS) to physically block his arrest when the CIO attempted to execute a warrant in January, and directing the PSS to delete records from secure phones used by military commanders shortly after his failed attempt to impose martial law.

Following the martial law bid, Yoon was summoned by the CIO for questioning three times in December but refused to comply.

The CIO attempted to detain him in early January but failed due to a prolonged standoff with presidential security personnel. He ended up being detained on January 15 at the presidential residence in central Seoul, making him the first sitting South Korean President to be arrested.

Yoon's lawyer argued that the former President defied the summonses because the detention warrant filed by the CIO failed to meet legal grounds.

Starting at 10:14 a.m., the special counsel team focused on questioning Yoon about obstructing the arrest in January.

In the afternoon, the team plans to question him about a Cabinet meeting he convened in the hours leading up to the short-lived martial law imposition.

Yoon arrived at the prosecutors' office through the main entrance in a black van and entered the building without answering reporters' questions. Earlier, Yoon's team had requested that he be allowed to enter privately through the underground parking lot, but the request was denied.

Shortly after his arrival, Yoon's legal team issued a statement strongly condemning the special counsel team, accusing it of staging a "political show" pertaining to the summoning of the former President, Yonhap news agency reported.

"(The special counsel team) must not unilaterally notify the suspect or publicly expose the suspect's appearance in a way that infringes on their rights," it said.

It marked the first time Yoon was questioned inside the prosecutors' office where he once served as a prosecutor and where he himself led a special counsel team investigating former President Park Geun-hye's influence-peddling scandal.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
Martial law is never the solution! As an Indian who grew up hearing about the 1975 Emergency, I know how dangerous this can be. Leaders must respect democratic processes at all times.
A
Aman W
Interesting how former prosecutors often become politicians and then face prosecution themselves. Reminds me of some cases in Indian politics too. The wheel of karma turns full circle!
P
Priyanka N
While accountability is important, I hope this doesn't become political vendetta. We've seen in India how investigations can be weaponized. The truth must come out fairly.
K
Karthik V
Deleting records from secure phones? That's straight out of a Bollywood political thriller! Shows how power corrupts leaders everywhere, not just in India. Need stronger safeguards globally.
M
Michael C
As someone working in India's tech sector, I'm shocked by the phone records deletion attempt. In our digital age, nothing truly gets deleted. Forensic experts would find it anyway!
N
Neha E
The security standoff reminds me of our own political dramas in India. But at least they're following due process - in our country, sometimes powerful people get away too easily.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50