NewKerala.com

Key Points

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has strongly criticized the snapback sanctions mechanism against Iran as a diplomatic trap. He argues that the mechanism, included in UN Resolution 2231, allows unilateral blocking of sanctions relief. Lavrov suggests the Europeans are deliberately seeking to reimpose sanctions without following proper diplomatic protocols. The international community remains divided over the legality and fairness of the proposed sanctions restoration.

Key Points: Lavrov Exposes Iran Nuclear Deal Snapback Sanctions Trap

  • Lavrov criticizes snapback mechanism as unfair diplomatic maneuver
  • UN Security Council fails to extend Iran nuclear deal resolution
  • E3 countries attempting to reimpose sanctions without proper procedure
  • Russia and Iran challenge legality of sanctions restoration
3 min read

Snapback mechanism for sanctions 'a trap' for Iran: Russian FM

Russian Foreign Minister reveals complex diplomatic tensions surrounding Iran nuclear deal sanctions mechanism and international negotiations.

"The snapback mechanism was created as a trap for Iran - Sergei Lavrov"

United Nations, Sep 28

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the "snapback" mechanism for sanctions against Iran was a trap.

The mechanism was included in UN Security Council Resolution 2231 that endorsed the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, following direct negotiations between the Iranian foreign minister and then US Secretary of State at the time, Lavrov told reporters on Saturday (local time).

This mechanism is not a typical arrangement, he said, adding that in essence, it allows any party to put sanctions relief to a vote and a Security Council member with veto power could unilaterally block it, opening the way for the return of sanctions.

The Iranians agreed to it because they had never anticipated a US withdrawal from the deal in 2018, said Lavrov, who was involved in the negotiations for the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

After the US withdrawal, Europe, instead of demanding that the United States go back to its obligations, also started to shy away from commitments to the deal, reports Xinhua news agency.

The Europeans are now cherry-picking what they want from Resolution 2231, said Lavrov. "And what they want is this exotic mechanism for a snapback."

The snapback mechanism was created as a trap for Iran, just yet another piece of proof that Iran did not intend to violate its commitments to the nuclear deal, he said.

The UN Security Council failed on Friday to adopt a resolution drafted by China and Russia that would have extended the JCPOA and Resolution 2231.

Lavrov warned against launching the procedure for the restoration of sanctions against Iran, noting that "it will deal a major blow to the credibility and the authority" of the United Nations.

Under Resolution 2231, the UN sanctions in place before the adoption of Resolution 2231 in 2015 would resume 30 days after the notification, unless the Security Council adopts a resolution to decide otherwise.

"We wanted to extend the Iran nuclear deal in its entirety without adding anything or crossing anything out in all its aspects, so it would continue to be in place for the time when we hoped we could continue negotiations," Lavrov said Saturday, adding that Iran is still prepared to have dialogue, maybe an indirect one through mediators and with the three European participants (E3) of the Iran nuclear deal -- Britain, France, and Germany.

Iran was holding conversations with the E3 lately. However, the outcome of those negotiations just proves that from the very beginning, the European trio was trying to find any pretext to bring back sanctions, he said.

The E3 recently said that they have triggered the snapback mechanism by notifying the Security Council of Tehran's "significant non-performance" on August 28.

However, the legality of the E3's move has been questioned as it has skipped the Dispute Resolution Mechanism provided for in the Iran nuclear deal and Resolution 2231.

Both Iran and Russia stated that the snapback of sanctions is legally null and void as the E3 were not in good standing to activate the mechanism.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is why India maintains good relations with both Russia and Iran. We understand the importance of energy security and regional stability. The snapback mechanism seems designed to fail from the beginning. Very unfair to Iran.
A
Arjun K
As an Indian who follows international relations closely, I must say this exposes the hypocrisy of Western powers. They talk about rules-based order but create mechanisms that only serve their interests. Russia and China are right to oppose this.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the frustration, let's not forget that Iran has legitimate security concerns too. The nuclear deal was working until the US pulled out. Now everyone is suffering because of one country's unilateral decision. 😔
V
Vikram M
This affects India directly - we need Iranian oil and the Chabahar port is crucial for our connectivity to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Hope our diplomats are watching this carefully and protecting our national interests.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I think we should be cautious about taking sides here. While the mechanism seems unfair, Iran's nuclear ambitions do pose regional security concerns. India should maintain balanced diplomacy rather than outright supporting either side.
A
Ananya R
The European countries are behaving exactly like colonial powers - making rules that only benefit them. Russia and China standing up against this is important for

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50