Key Points

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a critical amendment to its order against IndusInd Bank, revealing significant accounting irregularities. The probe centers around a KPMG report detailing a Rs 2,093 crore financial loss, which the bank allegedly failed to disclose promptly. Four senior executives have been barred from securities trading pending further investigation. Despite the ongoing scrutiny, RBI officials suggest the bank's situation is stabilizing and performance remains generally positive.

Key Points: SEBI Names IndusInd Bank Executives in Rs 2,093 Crore Probe

  • SEBI investigates accounting discrepancies at IndusInd Bank
  • KPMG reports Rs 2,093 crore financial loss
  • Four top executives named and restricted
  • Bank did not disclose findings timely
2 min read

SEBI amends IndusInd Bank order, names top executives amid ongoing probe

SEBI amends order against IndusInd Bank, highlights financial irregularities and names four senior executives barred from securities trading

"Everything is more or less on track - J Swaminathan, RBI Deputy Governor"

Mumbai, June 7

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a corrigendum to its interim order against IndusInd Bank Limited, replacing a key reference to clarify the nature of documents involved in the bank's internal dealings.

The market regulator said the term 'board note' used in its earlier order would now be read as 'engagement note'.

This correction comes as SEBI continues to investigate accounting irregularities at the private sector lender.

Earlier, the regulator had mentioned that global consulting firm KPMG was appointed by IndusInd Bank in February 2024 based on a 'board note'.

However, it has now clarified that KPMG's appointment was actually based on an 'engagement note', a less formal document usually used for assigning tasks to external consultants.

The SEBI probe revealed that the former Chief Financial Officer of IndusInd Bank had stated in January 2024 that a consultant was being hired to assess the financial impact of previously identified discrepancies.

KPMG later reported a financial loss of Rs 2,093 crore linked to these issues.

Despite the scale of the impact, SEBI noted that the bank neither disclosed these findings to the stock exchanges by March 10, 2025, nor marked the information as unpublished price-sensitive data until March 4, 2025.

KPMG reportedly sought further discussions with bank officials to verify the numbers, including specific accounting entries.

In its interim order, SEBI named four senior executives for their alleged roles in the matter: Arun Khurana, former Executive Director and Deputy CEO; Sushant Sourav, Head of Treasury Operations; Rohan Jathanna, Head of GMG Operations; and Anil Marco Rao, Chief Administrative Officer for Consumer Banking Operations.

These individuals have been barred from buying, selling, or dealing in securities in any form until further notice.

Meanwhile, on Friday, RBI Deputy Governor J Swaminathan said that the situation at IndusInd Bank is stabilising and 'everything is more or less on track.'

RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra also commented that the bank has taken significant steps to improve its accounting standards and is performing well overall.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
This is concerning for us retail investors. ₹2093 crore loss not being disclosed properly? SEBI needs to take strict action to maintain trust in our banking sector. Hope RBI's statement about stabilization is accurate 🤞
P
Priya M.
The terminology correction from 'board note' to 'engagement note' seems significant. Shows how careful regulators need to be with their wording. But the bigger issue is the delay in disclosure - this affects shareholder rights.
A
Amit S.
As someone who worked in banking compliance, I'm surprised KPMG's findings weren't treated as price-sensitive info immediately. Basic corporate governance failure here. Hope SEBI's actions serve as a warning to other banks.
N
Neha T.
Mixed signals here - RBI says everything's on track while SEBI is naming executives and restricting their dealings. Which one should we believe? 🤔 Maybe both are right but focusing on different aspects. Still confusing for common investors.
S
Sanjay V.
Good to see SEBI acting promptly, but why did it take them until now to correct the document terminology? These small details matter in financial investigations. Hope the probe brings out complete transparency.
K
Kavita R.
The named executives should get fair chance to explain their side. Sometimes these things are more about process gaps than individual wrongdoing. But yes, accountability is must in banking sector - people's money is involved!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50