US Bill Targets China, Foreign Adversaries Buying Farmland Near Key Sites

US lawmakers have introduced the Protecting US Farmland and Sensitive Sites from Foreign Adversaries Act to close loopholes in foreign land acquisitions. The bill targets purchases by China and other foreign adversaries near military bases and critical infrastructure. It grants CFIUS new authority to review and block such real estate transactions. The legislation also incorporates food security concerns into national security review procedures.

Key Points: US Bill Blocks China from Buying Farmland Near Sensitive Sites

  • Bill targets foreign adversaries buying farmland near sensitive US sites
  • Creates new review category for "elevated risk real estate transactions"
  • Gives CFIUS authority to block purchases by China, Russia, Iran, North Korea
  • Includes food security and agricultural biotechnology in CFIUS reviews
3 min read

US lawmakers introduce bill to block China, foreign adversaries from buying farmland near sensitive sites

US lawmakers introduce bill to block China and foreign adversaries from buying American farmland near military bases and critical infrastructure to protect national security.

"Food security is national security, and we cannot allow foreign adversaries like China to buy up American farmland near our most sensitive military and critical infrastructure sites. - John Moolenaar"

Washington DC, May 8

John Moolenaar, Chairman of the Select Committee on China, has introduced the Protecting US Farmland and Sensitive Sites from Foreign Adversaries Act, according to a press release issued by the SCCCP.

The proposed legislation seeks to strengthen U.S. national and food security by addressing loopholes in federal oversight related to foreign land acquisitions. According to the SCCCP release, foreign adversaries such as China have for years been able to acquire American farmland and properties located near sensitive national security sites with minimal scrutiny, and in some cases, without any review at all. The release stated that such purchases create risks for critical infrastructure, military preparedness, and the stability of the US food supply chain.

"Food security is national security, and we cannot allow foreign adversaries like China to buy up American farmland near our most sensitive military and critical infrastructure sites. This bipartisan legislation closes dangerous loopholes, presumptively bars foreign adversaries from purchasing land, and ensures the United States has the tools to stop these farmland deals before they threaten our security. It also implements the Trump Administration's America First Investment Policy and USDA's Farm Security Action Plan by giving the administration the authority needed to protect the United States farmland and real estate near sensitive facilities. This is a top concern of the American people and I hope Congress will act quickly to pass it into law," Moolenaar said, as quoted in the SCCCP release.

The release also cited remarks by Adam Savit, Director for China Policy at AFPI and former Senior Advisor for National Security at the US Department of Agriculture. Savit stated that foreign adversaries, particularly China, have taken advantage of gaps in federal laws to acquire land near US military bases, critical infrastructure, and food supply locations.

"We must treat food security as national security, and the federal government needs the jurisdiction and the tools to stop these transactions before they happen, not to negotiate mitigation agreements after the fact. States have led on this issue for years, and federal law should reinforce their efforts. Legislation is needed to close these loopholes and protect critical American infrastructure and American communities, and the provisions of this bill do just that," Savit said, as highlighted in the SCCCP release.

According to the release, the bill grants the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) the authority required to review real estate transactions involving foreign adversaries, including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It also categorises the purchase of US farmland and critical infrastructure by foreign adversaries as posing an unacceptable national security risk, with limited exceptions.

The legislation further creates a new classification called "elevated risk real estate transactions," mandating reviews of acquisitions involving farmland, ports, telecommunications infrastructure, and properties located near military bases and intelligence facilities.

Additionally, the bill incorporates food security and agricultural biotechnology concerns into CFIUS review procedures and ensures that the Secretary of Agriculture plays a central role in evaluating such transactions, according to the SCCCP release.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting timing. The US is getting stricter, but what about the billions of dollars in trade they still do with China? πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Seems a bit hypocritical to block farmland while buying Chinese goods. But I agree that nations need control over sensitive lands. India should learn from this – we have our own issues with foreign land grabs near borders.
V
Vikram M
As an Indian, I think every sovereign nation should have the right to regulate foreign land ownership near sensitive areas. The US is finally waking up to what China has been doing for years. We need similar laws in India, especially along our borders with China. Better late than never. πŸ‘
S
Sarah B
I'm an American living in India, and I see both sides. The US is right to tighten rules, but this bill feels like it could go too far. What about legal foreign investors who aren't a threat? Food security is important, but so is fair trade. Let's not turn this into a witch hunt.
R
Rohit P
Finally, the US is taking a stand! China has been sneakily buying farmland near military bases for years, and nobody did anything. This bill is a good step. India should follow suit – we have enough problems with Chinese influence in our neighborhood without letting them buy land near our own sensitive sites. #NationalSecurity
K
Kavya N
A thoughtful measure, but I worry about the broader impact on global relations. The US and China need to find balance, not just create more barriers. Food security is a shared challenge, and cooperation might be better than confrontation. Still, protecting sensitive sites is non-negotiable

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50