SC records Karnataka's assurance to provide 'protection and security' for screening 'Thug Life'

IANS June 19, 2025 332 views

The Supreme Court has recorded Karnataka's assurance to provide protection for the release of Mani Ratnam's and Kamal Haasan's film 'Thug Life'. This decision comes amid controversy over Haasan's comments regarding the Kannada language, which led to an unofficial ban in the state. The court emphasized that films with CBFC certification must be allowed to release, underscoring the importance of upholding the rule of law. The Karnataka government has pledged to maintain law and order, ensuring the film's safe screening.

"Rule of law demands that any film which has a CBFC certificate must be released." - Supreme Court
SC records Karnataka's assurance to provide 'protection and security' for screening 'Thug Life'
New Delhi, June 19: The Supreme Court on Thursday recorded the assurance given by the Karnataka government to give "protection and security" for the release of 'Thug Life' -- a film by veteran filmmaker Mani Ratnam and superstar Kamal Haasan — in the state's theatres.

Key Points

1

Karnataka assures protection for 'Thug Life' film release

2

SC records state's commitment amid controversy

3

Kamal Haasan's comments spark reactions in Karnataka

4

Legal action advised against coercion or violence

A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan told the Karnataka government to take legal action if any individual or group prevents the release of the movie or resorts to coercion or violence.

The Justice Bhuyan-led bench was hearing a plea alleging that the Karnataka government has prevented the film's theatrical release through "oral instructions and police interference" despite certification by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).

During the film's audio launch, Kamal Haasan claimed that "Kannada is born out of Tamil", sparking strong reactions in Karnataka. After the actor's refusal to issue an outright apology, an "extra-judicial ban" was imposed on the film's release in Karnataka, prompting M. Mahesh Reddy, a Bengaluru resident, to file a public interest litigation (PIL) before the top court.

In an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court, the Karnataka Home Department stated that it has not imposed any restriction on the release of the movie. It added that in the event the producers of the film decide to release the film in Karnataka, the state government will give "protection and security for such release and for the people connected therewith, including the cast, director, producers, the exhibitors, and the audience".

The affidavit said: "It is the duty and responsibility of the State Government to uphold fundamental rights of its citizens and in maintaining the 'Rule of Law' in the state. [I]t is submitted that, in the event the movie is released and screened in the State of Karnataka, the State Government, as is duty-bound, shall take all necessary steps to maintain law and order, and provide security to all the citizens concerned and other stakeholders."

On Tuesday, the Justice Bhuyan-led Bench made scathing remarks in the matter and said that it cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to take over the streets.

"Rule of law demands that any film which has a CBFC certificate must be released, and the state government has to ensure its screening. It can't be that, at the threat of burning down the cinemas, the film can't be released. We are not passing an order that people come and watch the film. But the film must be released," it remarked.

"We cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to take over the streets. The rule of law must prevail," the apex court told the Karnataka government's counsel.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Finally some sense prevails! The Supreme Court's strong stance on rule of law is commendable. Films with CBFC clearance should be allowed to release without threats or violence. Kamal Haasan's comments were unnecessary, but banning films isn't the solution. Let people decide what to watch.
P
Priya M.
As someone from Karnataka, I'm disappointed by Kamal Haasan's insensitive remarks about Kannada. But banning films sets a dangerous precedent. The court is right - we can't have mobs dictating what art gets shown. Hope both states can move past this linguistic rivalry 🤞
A
Arjun S.
This is a victory for creative freedom! Mani Ratnam's films always push boundaries. The court's message is clear - no extra-judicial bans. Though I wish Kamal Haasan had been more diplomatic with his words. Language politics shouldn't overshadow artistic expression.
S
Shweta R.
While I support the court's decision, I'm worried about the security situation. The Karnataka government must ensure theaters aren't vandalized. Why can't we have peaceful protests instead of threats? This isn't the India we want to show the world 😔
V
Vikram J.
The real issue is why CBFC clears controversial content knowing it might create law & order problems. There should be better consultation with state governments before certification. That said, once cleared, the rule of law must prevail as SC rightly observed.
N
Neha P.
As a film student, this judgment gives me hope! Artists shouldn't live in fear of fringe groups. But stars must also be more responsible with their words - especially when discussing sensitive topics like language origins. Two wrongs don't make a right.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: